Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$31.73
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.81B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. DCZRX (6.81B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (0.84) vs DCZRX (0.68). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. DCZRX (10.38). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 63.75 vs. DCZRX (49.16).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.306 | 8.273 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 27.7B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 16.05 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.57 | 33.20 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.16 | 63.75 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers