Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Nomura Small Cap Core R6
Price$32.18
Change+$1.08 (+3.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. DCZRX (5.87B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (1.03) vs DCZRX (0.54). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (10 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. DCZRX (3.45). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. DCZRX (13.10).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.543 | 6.434 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 29.7B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.03 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.45 | 18.62 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.27 | 39.32 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.10 | 25.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 169.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers