Advertisement
DCYHY vs NWWCF
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCYHY is a Hold and NWWCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DCYHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWWCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DCYHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NWWCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DCYHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWWCF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DCYHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- NWWCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DCYHY (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWWCF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -6.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.74%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+1.53% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| DCYHY | NWWCF | DCYHY / NWWCF | |
| Capitalization | 8.94B | 26.4B | 34% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.786 | 199.101 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.97 | 3.77 | 344% |
| Revenue | 105B | 157B | 67% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 28.8B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 21B | - |
DCYHY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DCYHY | NWWCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 23% | 3 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 2% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HSBH | 83.10 | 1.03 | +1.26% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC ADRHEDGED HSBH | |||
| IXUS | 85.50 | 0.22 | +0.26% |
| iShares Core MSCI Total Intl Stk ETF | |||
| PCEF | 19.93 | 0.02 | +0.11% |
| Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | |||
| DHF | 2.52 | -0.01 | -0.40% |
| BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund | |||
| NTSE | 37.49 | -0.19 | -0.49% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF | |||
DCYHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DCYHY and LNC have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCYHY and LNC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DCYHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCYHY | 100% | N/A | ||
| LNC - DCYHY | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.75% | ||
| PRI - DCYHY | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ABL - DCYHY | 3% Poorly correlated | +5.66% | ||
| BHF - DCYHY | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| GL - DCYHY | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.06% | ||
More | ||||
NWWCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NWWCF and PIAIF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWWCF and PIAIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWWCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWWCF | 100% | -10.18% | ||
| PIAIF - NWWCF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FLFG - NWWCF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWLIF - NWWCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| ELFIF - NWWCF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| DCYHY - NWWCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||