DCYHY
Price
$27.15
Change
-$5.44 (-16.69%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NWWCF
Price
$8.09
Change
+$2.46 (+43.69%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.23B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCYHY vs NWWCF

Header iconDCYHY vs NWWCF Comparison
Open Charts DCYHY vs NWWCFBanner chart's image
Discovery Holdings
Price$27.15
Change-$5.44 (-16.69%)
Volume$604
Capitalization9.92B
New China Life Ins
Price$8.09
Change+$2.46 (+43.69%)
Volume$893
Capitalization32.23B
DCYHY vs NWWCF Comparison Chart in %
DCYHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWWCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCYHY vs. NWWCF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCYHY is a Hold and NWWCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (DCYHY: $26.45 vs. NWWCF: $8.09)
Brand notoriety: DCYHY and NWWCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCYHY: 100% vs. NWWCF: 11%
Market capitalization -- DCYHY: $9.92B vs. NWWCF: $32.23B
DCYHY [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $9.92B. NWWCF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $32.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $177.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $28.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCYHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWWCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DCYHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWWCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWWCF is a better buy in the long-term than DCYHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCYHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWWCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCYHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NWWCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCYHY is a better buy in the short-term than NWWCF.

Price Growth

DCYHY (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWWCF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -4.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.89% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWWCF($32.2B) has a higher market cap than DCYHY($9.92B). DCYHY has higher P/E ratio than NWWCF: DCYHY (12.97) vs NWWCF (4.57). NWWCF YTD gains are higher at: 11.689 vs. DCYHY (0.000). NWWCF has higher revenues than DCYHY: NWWCF (157B) vs DCYHY (105B).
DCYHYNWWCFDCYHY / NWWCF
Capitalization9.92B32.2B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00011.689-
P/E Ratio12.974.57284%
Revenue105B157B67%
Total CashN/A28.8B-
Total DebtN/A21B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCYHY vs NWWCF: Fundamental Ratings
DCYHY
NWWCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4879
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8550
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7322
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1175

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWWCF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCYHY (61). This means that NWWCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

NWWCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCYHY (85). This means that NWWCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

DCYHY's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NWWCF (100). This means that DCYHY’s stock grew similarly to NWWCF’s over the last 12 months.

NWWCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCYHY (72). This means that NWWCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

NWWCF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCYHY (73). This means that NWWCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCYHYNWWCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCYHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWWCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIXP19.950.03
+0.18%
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Inc Prm ETF
FSIG19.150.01
+0.05%
First Trust Ltd Drtn Inv Grd Corp ETF
BUYO28.98N/A
N/A
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF
USSE34.53-0.03
-0.09%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF
RSF14.45-0.08
-0.55%
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund

DCYHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCYHY and LNC have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCYHY and LNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCYHY
1D Price
Change %
DCYHY100%
N/A
LNC - DCYHY
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
PRI - DCYHY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
BHF - DCYHY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
GL - DCYHY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
PIAIF - DCYHY
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
More

NWWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWWCF and PIAIF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWWCF and PIAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWWCF
1D Price
Change %
NWWCF100%
-0.00%
PIAIF - NWWCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
FLFG - NWWCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - NWWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
ELFIF - NWWCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
DCYHY - NWWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More