Advertisement
DCYHY vs MDBPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCYHY is a Hold and MDBPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DCYHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDBPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DCYHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MDBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDBPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MDBPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
DCYHY (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MDBPF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-0.33% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Specialty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
| DCYHY | MDBPF | DCYHY / MDBPF | |
| Capitalization | 8.33B | 9.12B | 91% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.786 | 59.296 | -25% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.06 | 26.62 | 49% |
| Revenue | N/A | 8.34B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
DCYHY | MDBPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DCYHY's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MDBPF (60). This means that DCYHY’s stock grew similarly to MDBPF’s over the last 12 months.
MDBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DCYHY (64). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew similarly to DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.
MDBPF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCYHY (99). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.
MDBPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DCYHY (56). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew similarly to DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.
MDBPF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCYHY (78). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.
| DCYHY | MDBPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 11% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% | 3 days ago 14% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 3 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
DCYHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DCYHY and PIAIF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCYHY and PIAIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DCYHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCYHY | 100% | N/A | ||
| PIAIF - DCYHY | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
| NWWCF - DCYHY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FLFG - DCYHY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MDBPF - DCYHY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ELFIF - DCYHY | -0% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||
MDBPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MDBPF and GWLIF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDBPF and GWLIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDBPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDBPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GWLIF - MDBPF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ELFIF - MDBPF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
| KCLI - MDBPF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| PIAIF - MDBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
| FLFG - MDBPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||