DCYHY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
8.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GL
Price
$130.82
Change
-$0.33 (-0.25%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.41B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCYHY vs GL

Header iconDCYHY vs GL Comparison
Open Charts DCYHY vs GLBanner chart's image
Discovery Holdings
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$604
Capitalization8.74B
Globe Life
Price$130.82
Change-$0.33 (-0.25%)
Volume$592.39K
Capitalization10.41B
DCYHY vs GL Comparison Chart in %
DCYHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCYHY vs. GL commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCYHY is a Hold and GL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DCYHY: $26.45 vs. GL: $131.15)
Brand notoriety: DCYHY and GL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCYHY: 100% vs. GL: 23%
Market capitalization -- DCYHY: $8.74B vs. GL: $10.41B
DCYHY [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $8.74B. GL’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $10.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $151.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $26.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCYHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DCYHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the long-term than DCYHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCYHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCYHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the short-term than DCYHY.

Price Growth

DCYHY (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GL (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

GL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.10% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GL($10.4B) has a higher market cap than DCYHY($8.74B). DCYHY has higher P/E ratio than GL: DCYHY (12.97) vs GL (9.49). GL YTD gains are higher at: 18.591 vs. DCYHY (-14.786). DCYHY has higher revenues than GL: DCYHY (105B) vs GL (5.87B).
DCYHYGLDCYHY / GL
Capitalization8.74B10.4B84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.78618.591-80%
P/E Ratio12.979.49137%
Revenue105B5.87B1,788%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.79B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCYHY vs GL: Fundamental Ratings
DCYHY
GL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8357
SMR RATING
1..100
9885
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6836
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DCYHY's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as GL (76). This means that DCYHY’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as DCYHY (83). This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as DCYHY (98). This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as DCYHY (71). This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

GL's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as DCYHY (68). This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to DCYHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCYHYGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
11%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
1%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCYHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQQQ30.230.20
+0.65%
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
IBMS25.95N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Mun Bd ETF
UTEN44.37-0.11
-0.24%
F/m US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
XFLX24.49-0.07
-0.28%
FundX Flexible ETF
SMIG28.25-0.20
-0.70%
Bahl & Gaynor Sm/Md Cp Inc Gr ETF

DCYHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCYHY and LNC have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCYHY and LNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCYHY
1D Price
Change %
DCYHY100%
N/A
LNC - DCYHY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
PRI - DCYHY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
ABL - DCYHY
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
BHF - DCYHY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
GL - DCYHY
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More

GL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GL has been closely correlated with PRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GL jumps, then PRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GL
1D Price
Change %
GL100%
-1.04%
PRI - GL
72%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
CNO - GL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
AFL - GL
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
MET - GL
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UNM - GL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
More