DCOHF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.03 (-5.08%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
220.93M
MNNGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
65.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCOHF vs MNNGF

Header iconDCOHF vs MNNGF Comparison
Open Charts DCOHF vs MNNGFBanner chart's image
Dickson Concepts International
Price$0.56
Change-$0.03 (-5.08%)
Volume$27.4K
Capitalization220.93M
Affluent Partners Holdings
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$917
Capitalization65.57M
DCOHF vs MNNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCOHF vs. MNNGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCOHF is a Hold and MNNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DCOHF: $0.56 vs. MNNGF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: DCOHF and MNNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCOHF: 100% vs. MNNGF: 152%
Market capitalization -- DCOHF: $220.93M vs. MNNGF: $65.57M
DCOHF [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $220.93M. MNNGF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $65.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCOHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DCOHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DCOHF is a better buy in the long-term than MNNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCOHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNNGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCOHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MNNGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCOHF is a better buy in the short-term than MNNGF.

Price Growth

DCOHF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNNGF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+4.33% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DCOHF($221M) has a higher market cap than MNNGF($65.6M). MNNGF has higher P/E ratio than DCOHF: MNNGF (31.15) vs DCOHF (6.84). MNNGF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. DCOHF (-12.174). DCOHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 325M vs. MNNGF (13.5M). DCOHF has more cash in the bank: 3.55B vs. MNNGF (17.3M). MNNGF has less debt than DCOHF: MNNGF (5.23M) vs DCOHF (1.7B). DCOHF has higher revenues than MNNGF: DCOHF (2.13B) vs MNNGF (81.5M).
DCOHFMNNGFDCOHF / MNNGF
Capitalization221M65.6M337%
EBITDA325M13.5M2,407%
Gain YTD-12.17460.000-20%
P/E Ratio6.8431.1522%
Revenue2.13B81.5M2,615%
Total Cash3.55B17.3M20,509%
Total Debt1.7B5.23M32,415%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCOHF vs MNNGF: Fundamental Ratings
DCOHF
MNNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5351
SMR RATING
1..100
5497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DCOHF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNNGF (87). This means that DCOHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOHF (53). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew similarly to DCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

DCOHF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNNGF (97). This means that DCOHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCOHF (77). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

DCOHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNNGF (100). This means that DCOHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCOHFMNNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSQRX17.470.13
+0.75%
Invesco MSCI World SRI Index R
NWAWX14.630.03
+0.21%
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq Instl Ser
MSGZX16.060.03
+0.19%
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
GLPCX31.250.02
+0.06%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras C
VSRAX23.23-0.07
-0.30%
Invesco Small Cap Value R

DCOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCOHF and CFRHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCOHF and CFRHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCOHF
1D Price
Change %
DCOHF100%
N/A
CFRHF - DCOHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
CFRUY - DCOHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
CHDRF - DCOHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
CEBTF - DCOHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJEWF - DCOHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNNGF and REAL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNNGF and REAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNNGF
1D Price
Change %
MNNGF100%
N/A
REAL - MNNGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
LVMHF - MNNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
DCOHF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNDZF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - MNNGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More