DCNSF
Price
$8.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
29.06B
GL
Price
$144.56
Change
+$1.53 (+1.07%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.71B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCNSF vs GL

Header iconDCNSF vs GL Comparison
Open Charts DCNSF vs GLBanner chart's image
Dai-ichi Life Holdings
Price$8.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization29.06B
Globe Life
Price$144.56
Change+$1.53 (+1.07%)
Volume$427.74K
Capitalization11.71B
DCNSF vs GL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DCNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCNSF vs. GL commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCNSF is a Buy and GL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DCNSF: $8.33 vs. GL: $144.56)
Brand notoriety: DCNSF and GL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCNSF: 3% vs. GL: 69%
Market capitalization -- DCNSF: $29.06B vs. GL: $11.71B
DCNSF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $29.06B. GL’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $11.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $132.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCNSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DCNSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DCNSF is a better buy in the long-term than GL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCNSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCNSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCNSF is a better buy in the short-term than GL.

Price Growth

DCNSF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GL (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

GL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.62% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DCNSF($29.1B) has a higher market cap than GL($11.7B). GL has higher P/E ratio than DCNSF: GL (11.56) vs DCNSF (10.69). GL YTD gains are higher at: 30.464 vs. DCNSF (23.409).
DCNSFGLDCNSF / GL
Capitalization29.1B11.7B249%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.40930.46477%
P/E Ratio10.6911.5692%
RevenueN/A5.87B-
Total CashN/A17.7B-
Total DebtN/A2.79B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCNSF vs GL: Fundamental Ratings
DCNSF
GL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2051
SMR RATING
1..100
10086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4921
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2930
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5033

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DCNSF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (82). This means that DCNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

DCNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as GL (51). This means that DCNSF’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNSF (100). This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNSF (49). This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

DCNSF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as GL (30). This means that DCNSF’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCNSFGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXR77.610.96
+1.25%
First Trust Indtls/PrdcrDurbAlphaDEX®ETF
DVSP26.48N/A
N/A
WEBs Defined Volatility SPY ETF
HCRB35.55-0.01
-0.01%
Hartford Core Bond ETF
EMCB66.91-0.20
-0.31%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corp Bd ETF
SEF31.28-0.21
-0.68%
ProShares Short Financials

DCNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCNSF and ELFIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCNSF and ELFIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCNSF
1D Price
Change %
DCNSF100%
N/A
ELFIF - DCNSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
BHF - DCNSF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
PRI - DCNSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
FG - DCNSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
GL - DCNSF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

GL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GL has been closely correlated with PRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GL jumps, then PRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GL
1D Price
Change %
GL100%
+1.07%
PRI - GL
71%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
CNO - GL
67%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
UNM - GL
66%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
MET - GL
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
PRU - GL
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
More