Advertisement
DCMDF vs MRLWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCMDF is a Hold and MRLWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DCMDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DCMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DCMDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRLWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DCMDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MRLWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
DCMDF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -5.53% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.25% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.97% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| DCMDF | MRLWF | DCMDF / MRLWF | |
| Capitalization | 59M | 460M | 13% |
| EBITDA | 57.6M | 43.1M | 134% |
| Gain YTD | -23.746 | 47.462 | -50% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.29 | 87.51 | 15% |
| Revenue | 462M | 408M | 113% |
| Total Cash | 2.89M | 30.8M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 264M | 21.6M | 1,222% |
DCMDF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DCMDF | MRLWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 27% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | N/A |
Advertisement
DCMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DCMDF and PRDO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCMDF and PRDO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DCMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCMDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRDO - DCMDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| ESTTF - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRWC - DCMDF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UDMY - DCMDF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| KSCP - DCMDF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
MRLWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRLWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRLWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CPBLF - MRLWF | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - MRLWF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DAO - MRLWF | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.43% | ||
| GLDAF - MRLWF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DCMDF - MRLWF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||