DCMDF
Price
$1.19
Change
-$0.01 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
129.12M
MRLWF
Price
$5.85
Change
-$0.05 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
699.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCMDF vs MRLWF

Header iconDCMDF vs MRLWF Comparison
Open Charts DCMDF vs MRLWFBanner chart's image
Data Communications Management
Price$1.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.83%)
Volume$5.75K
Capitalization129.12M
Marlowe
Price$5.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.85%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization699.98M
DCMDF vs MRLWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DCMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCMDF vs. MRLWF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCMDF is a Hold and MRLWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DCMDF: $1.19 vs. MRLWF: $5.85)
Brand notoriety: DCMDF and MRLWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCMDF: 75% vs. MRLWF: 28%
Market capitalization -- DCMDF: $129.12M vs. MRLWF: $699.98M
DCMDF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $129.12M. MRLWF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $699.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCMDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DCMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DCMDF and MRLWF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCMDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRLWF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MRLWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRLWF is a better buy in the short-term than DCMDF.

Price Growth

DCMDF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -7.03% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.02% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRLWF($700M) has a higher market cap than DCMDF($129M). MRLWF has higher P/E ratio than DCMDF: MRLWF (3333.33) vs DCMDF (20.28). MRLWF YTD gains are higher at: 48.477 vs. DCMDF (-14.395). MRLWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.3M vs. DCMDF (28.2M). MRLWF has more cash in the bank: 19.8M vs. DCMDF (2.99M). DCMDF has less debt than MRLWF: DCMDF (61.7M) vs MRLWF (204M). MRLWF has higher revenues than DCMDF: MRLWF (404M) vs DCMDF (281M).
DCMDFMRLWFDCMDF / MRLWF
Capitalization129M700M18%
EBITDA28.2M49.3M57%
Gain YTD-14.39548.477-30%
P/E Ratio20.283333.331%
Revenue281M404M70%
Total Cash2.99M19.8M15%
Total Debt61.7M204M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCMDF: Fundamental Ratings
DCMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCMDFMRLWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSECX34.780.22
+0.64%
Calvert Equity C
FIVVX36.710.17
+0.47%
Macquarie Opportunity R6
CBECX10.730.04
+0.37%
Allspring Large Cap Value CL C
NUIIX31.460.04
+0.13%
Nuveen International Dividend Growth I
FEVIX23.23-0.01
-0.04%
First Eagle US I

DCMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCMDF and PRDO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCMDF and PRDO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCMDF
1D Price
Change %
DCMDF100%
-0.83%
PRDO - DCMDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
ESTTF - DCMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRWC - DCMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UDMY - DCMDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.73%
KSCP - DCMDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
More

MRLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRLWF
1D Price
Change %
MRLWF100%
N/A
CPBLF - MRLWF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIGTF - MRLWF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAO - MRLWF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
GLDAF - MRLWF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCMDF - MRLWF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More