Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$30.44
Change-$0.63 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. DCCIX (6.3B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.22) vs DCCIX (0.59). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. DCCIX (-4.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. DCCIX (26.84).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.238 | 6.726 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 162B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.22 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.18 | 1.42 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.95 | 33.14 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.84 | 48.22 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.61 | 137.58 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement