Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$30.37
Change-$0.21 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.64B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.64
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. DCCIX (6.64B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (0.90) vs DCCIX (0.61). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. DCCIX (4.24). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. DCCIX (37.18).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.066 | 3.468 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 25.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 8.73 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.92 | 18.75 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | 51.48 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.03 | 85.72 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement