Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$29.94
Change+$0.20 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. DCCIX (7.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (0.92) vs DCCIX (0.62). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. DCCIX (0.04). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. DCCIX (42.28).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.481 | 2.204 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 25.6B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.92 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.04 | 3.28 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.02 | 31.42 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 60.96 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.06 | 82.15 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers