Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$30.44
Change-$0.63 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.94
Change-$0.85 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. DCCIX (6.3B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (0.80) vs DCCIX (0.59). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. DCCIX (-4.18). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.37 vs. DCCIX (26.84).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.238 | 11.561 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 29B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.80 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.18 | 4.32 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.95 | 36.90 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.84 | 47.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.61 | 111.26 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers