Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCCX vs FSSNX
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCCX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
Price$24.33
Change-$0.51 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.94
Change-$0.85 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCCX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. DCCCX (6.3B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs DCCCX (0.00). DCCCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCCX (20 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCCX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. DCCCX (-5.26). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.37 vs. DCCCX (18.06).
| DCCCX | FSSNX | DCCCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.388 | 11.561 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 29B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.26 | 4.32 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 36.90 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.06 | 47.37 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.62 | 111.26 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement