Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCCX vs FSSNX
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCCX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
Price$23.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.24
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCCX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. DCCCX (7.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs DCCCX (0.00). DCCCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCCX (20 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCCX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.59 vs. DCCCX (-2.52). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.41 vs. DCCCX (29.46).
| DCCCX | FSSNX | DCCCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.245 | 2.204 | -102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 25.6B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.52 | 1.59 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.93 | 25.84 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.46 | 57.41 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.20 | 80.03 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement