Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCAX vs NAESX
DCCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCAX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core A
Price$29.18
Change+$0.25 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.35B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
DCCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCAX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. DCCAX (7.35B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCAX: NAESX (1.28) vs DCCAX (0.43). DCCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCAX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. DCCAX (8.42). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. DCCAX (44.98).
| DCCAX | NAESX | DCCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.018 | 1.432 | -71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.35B | 148B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.28 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 12.22 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.51 | 37.83 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.98 | 69.32 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.25 | 108.83 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement