Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCAX vs FSSNX
DCCAX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCAX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core A
Price$29.00
Change+$0.19 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
DCCAX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCAX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCAX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. DCCAX (7.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCAX: FSSNX (0.92) vs DCCAX (0.43). DCCAX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCAX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCAX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. DCCAX (-0.26). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. DCCAX (40.55).
| DCCAX | FSSNX | DCCAX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.628 | 2.204 | -74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 25.6B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.92 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.26 | 3.28 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.18 | 31.42 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.55 | 60.96 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.78 | 82.15 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers