DCBO
Price
$31.18
Change
+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
895.81M
60 days until earnings call
LQWDF
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
28.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCBO vs LQWDF

Header iconDCBO vs LQWDF Comparison
Open Charts DCBO vs LQWDFBanner chart's image
Docebo
Price$31.18
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Volume$158.08K
Capitalization895.81M
LQWD TECHNOLOGIES
Price$1.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$74.63K
Capitalization28.14M
DCBO vs LQWDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DCBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCBO vs. LQWDF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCBO is a Hold and LQWDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DCBO: $31.18 vs. LQWDF: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: DCBO and LQWDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCBO: 195% vs. LQWDF: 54%
Market capitalization -- DCBO: $895.81M vs. LQWDF: $28.14M
DCBO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $895.81M. LQWDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $28.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCBO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLQWDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DCBO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LQWDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DCBO is a better buy in the long-term than LQWDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCBO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQWDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCBO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LQWDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQWDF is a better buy in the short-term than DCBO.

Price Growth

DCBO (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LQWDF (@Packaged Software) price change was -20.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

DCBO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DCBO($896M) has a higher market cap than LQWDF($28.1M). LQWDF (-29.933) and DCBO (-30.355) have similar YTD gains . DCBO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.3M vs. LQWDF (-2.12M). DCBO has more cash in the bank: 64.6M vs. LQWDF (1.33M). DCBO has higher revenues than LQWDF: DCBO (231M) vs LQWDF (8.18K).
DCBOLQWDFDCBO / LQWDF
Capitalization896M28.1M3,189%
EBITDA24.3M-2.12M-1,149%
Gain YTD-30.355-29.933101%
P/E Ratio45.19N/A-
Revenue231M8.18K2,824,652%
Total Cash64.6M1.33M4,857%
Total Debt1.37MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQWDF: Fundamental Ratings
LQWDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCBOLQWDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFKX20.12N/A
N/A
MFS Total Return R6
FMCVX26.63N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val R6
EQNVX23.64N/A
N/A
MFS Equity Income R6
RYLGX113.76-0.42
-0.37%
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth A
NRAAX52.96-0.35
-0.66%
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity A

DCBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DCBO has been loosely correlated with DV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DCBO jumps, then DV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCBO
1D Price
Change %
DCBO100%
+0.13%
DV - DCBO
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
HUBS - DCBO
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
HPTO - DCBO
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KVYO - DCBO
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.34%
JAMF - DCBO
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More

LQWDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQWDF and EVH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQWDF and EVH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQWDF
1D Price
Change %
LQWDF100%
+0.19%
EVH - LQWDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
XYZ - LQWDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
EB - LQWDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
QLYS - LQWDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
DCBO - LQWDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More