DC
Price
$4.66
Change
+$0.13 (+2.87%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
523.52M
67 days until earnings call
NAMM
Price
$3.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
169.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DC vs NAMM

Header iconDC vs NAMM Comparison
Open Charts DC vs NAMMBanner chart's image
Dakota Gold
Price$4.66
Change+$0.13 (+2.87%)
Volume$1.36M
Capitalization523.52M
Namib Minerals
Price$3.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$116.44K
Capitalization169.62M
DC vs NAMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DC vs. NAMM commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DC is a StrongBuy and NAMM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DC: $4.64 vs. NAMM: $3.12)
Brand notoriety: DC and NAMM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DC: 78% vs. NAMM: 10%
Market capitalization -- DC: $508.92M vs. NAMM: $169.62M
DC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $508.92M. NAMM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $169.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAMM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DC is a better buy in the long-term than NAMM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAMM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NAMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAMM is a better buy in the short-term than DC.

Price Growth

DC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.62% price change this week, while NAMM (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

DC is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DC($524M) has a higher market cap than NAMM($170M). DC YTD gains are higher at: 111.136 vs. NAMM (-70.161).
DCNAMMDC / NAMM
Capitalization524M170M308%
EBITDA-26.05MN/A-
Gain YTD111.136-70.161-158%
P/E RatioN/A47.27-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash42MN/A-
Total Debt275KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCNAMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAGCX53.80N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth C
ASYLX16.03N/A
N/A
AB Select US Long/Short Advisor
ARAQX11.10N/A
N/A
Aristotle Value Eq A
NUICX30.00N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Dividend Growth C
LFGIX43.36N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Growth I

DC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DC has been loosely correlated with SA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DC jumps, then SA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DC
1D Price
Change %
DC100%
+2.54%
SA - DC
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
FNV - DC
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
PAAS - DC
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.23%
AEM - DC
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
WPM - DC
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More

NAMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAMM and AUST have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAMM and AUST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAMM
1D Price
Change %
NAMM100%
N/A
AUST - NAMM
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
DC - NAMM
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
ORLA - NAMM
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
GORO - NAMM
-4%
Poorly correlated
+6.51%
BGL - NAMM
-4%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
More