DC
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.03 (-1.37%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:09 PM (EDT)
12 days until earnings call
MSLVF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

DC vs MSLVF

Header iconDC vs MSLVF Comparison
Open Charts DC vs MSLVFBanner chart's image
Dakota Gold
Price$2.17
Change-$0.03 (-1.37%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
FIRST ANDES SILVER
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
DC vs MSLVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DC vs. MSLVF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DC is a Hold and MSLVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (DC: $2.19 vs. MSLVF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: DC and MSLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DC: 73% vs. MSLVF: 32%
Market capitalization -- DC: $205.57M vs. MSLVF: $2.17M
DC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $205.57M. MSLVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSLVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSLVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSLVF is a better buy in the long-term than DC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -12.40% price change this week, while MSLVF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

DC is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DC($206M) has a higher market cap than MSLVF($2.17M). DC has higher P/E ratio than MSLVF: DC (41.32) vs MSLVF (1.29). MSLVF YTD gains are higher at: 35.149 vs. DC (-16.412). MSLVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.23M vs. DC (-37.73M). DC has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. MSLVF (31.9K). MSLVF has less debt than DC: MSLVF (54.7K) vs DC (230K). DC (0) and MSLVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DCMSLVFDC / MSLVF
Capitalization206M2.17M9,511%
EBITDA-37.73M-1.23M3,075%
Gain YTD-16.41235.149-47%
P/E Ratio41.321.293,214%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25.5M31.9K79,937%
Total Debt230K54.7K420%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

DC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DC has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DC jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DC
1D Price
Change %
DC100%
-1.35%
MAG - DC
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
SA - DC
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
CDE - DC
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
AG - DC
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.37%
EXK - DC
41%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
More

MSLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLVF and QDROF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLVF and QDROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLVF
1D Price
Change %
MSLVF100%
N/A
QDROF - MSLVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFOXF - MSLVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRFF - MSLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.55%
BDGCF - MSLVF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DC - MSLVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More