DBSDY
Price
$164.80
Change
+$1.30 (+0.80%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
116.61B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WF
Price
$53.51
Change
+$0.47 (+0.89%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.92B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBSDY vs WF

Header iconDBSDY vs WF Comparison
Open Charts DBSDY vs WFBanner chart's image
DBS Group Holdings
Price$164.80
Change+$1.30 (+0.80%)
Volume$36.4K
Capitalization116.61B
Woori Financial Group
Price$53.51
Change+$0.47 (+0.89%)
Volume$37.68K
Capitalization12.92B
DBSDY vs WF Comparison Chart in %
DBSDY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBSDY vs. WF commentary
Nov 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBSDY is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2025
Stock price -- (DBSDY: $164.80 vs. WF: $53.51)
Brand notoriety: DBSDY and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBSDY: 76% vs. WF: 78%
Market capitalization -- DBSDY: $116.61B vs. WF: $12.92B
DBSDY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $116.61B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBSDY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DBSDY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than DBSDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBSDY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBSDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBSDY is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

DBSDY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

DBSDY is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

WF is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDY($117B) has a higher market cap than WF($12.9B). DBSDY has higher P/E ratio than WF: DBSDY (13.76) vs WF (6.27). WF YTD gains are higher at: 74.606 vs. DBSDY (34.888). WF has higher revenues than DBSDY: WF (12.85T) vs DBSDY (22.8B).
DBSDYWFDBSDY / WF
Capitalization117B12.9B907%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.88874.60647%
P/E Ratio13.766.27219%
Revenue22.8B12.85T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A80.55T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBSDY vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
DBSDY
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5676
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (63) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DBSDY (90) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DBSDY (3) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DBSDY (4) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DBSDY (46) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DBSDY (20) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBSDYWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBSDY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THAR2.450.20
+8.89%
Tharimmune Inc.
BEAM22.211.61
+7.82%
Beam Therapeutics
GGG82.282.60
+3.26%
Graco
RSVR7.300.08
+1.11%
Reservoir Media
GITS1.24-0.07
-5.34%
Global Interactive Technologies Inc

DBSDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDY has been closely correlated with UOVEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DBSDY jumps, then UOVEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDY
1D Price
Change %
DBSDY100%
+0.80%
UOVEY - DBSDY
72%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
OVCHY - DBSDY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
WF - DBSDY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
IBOC - DBSDY
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
EBKDY - DBSDY
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
+0.89%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
KB - WF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
SBNY - WF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DBSDY - WF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
MFG - WF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
More