DBOEY
Price
$29.91
Change
-$0.62 (-2.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
35.3B
92 days until earnings call
HAFG
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.02 (-3.08%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
282.03K
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBOEY vs HAFG

Header iconDBOEY vs HAFG Comparison
Open Charts DBOEY vs HAFGBanner chart's image
Deutsche Boerse AG
Price$29.91
Change-$0.62 (-2.03%)
Volume$145.93K
Capitalization35.3B
Holistic Asset Finance Group
Price$0.63
Change-$0.02 (-3.08%)
Volume$350
Capitalization282.03K
DBOEY vs HAFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DBOEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBOEY vs. HAFG commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBOEY is a Hold and HAFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DBOEY: $29.91 vs. HAFG: $0.63)
Brand notoriety: DBOEY and HAFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBOEY: 43% vs. HAFG: 22%
Market capitalization -- DBOEY: $35.3B vs. HAFG: $282.03K
DBOEY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $35.3B. HAFG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $282.03K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBOEY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DBOEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBOEY is a better buy in the long-term than HAFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBOEY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBOEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HAFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBOEY is a better buy in the short-term than HAFG.

Price Growth

DBOEY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while HAFG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

DBOEY is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBOEY($35.3B) has a higher market cap than HAFG($282K). DBOEY YTD gains are higher at: 31.850 vs. HAFG (-16.476). DBOEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.78B vs. HAFG (-1.93M). DBOEY has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. HAFG (97.8K). DBOEY has higher revenues than HAFG: DBOEY (5.68B) vs HAFG (11.1M).
DBOEYHAFGDBOEY / HAFG
Capitalization35.3B282K12,517,730%
EBITDA2.78B-1.93M-144,593%
Gain YTD31.850-16.476-193%
P/E Ratio18.90N/A-
Revenue5.68B11.1M51,126%
Total Cash209B97.8K213,701,431%
Total DebtN/A432K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBOEY vs HAFG: Fundamental Ratings
DBOEY
HAFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
4898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFG's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBOEY (94). This means that HAFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBOEY’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAFG (100). This means that DBOEY’s stock grew significantly faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEY's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAFG (98). This means that DBOEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (64). This means that DBOEY’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAFG (100). This means that DBOEY’s stock grew significantly faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBOEYHAFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBOEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KYMR45.79-0.06
-0.13%
Kymera Therapeutics
RKLB47.42-0.71
-1.48%
Rocket Lab Corporation
YEXT8.46-0.18
-2.08%
Yext
RELL10.52-0.34
-3.13%
Richardson Electronics Ltd
CLRB5.09-0.26
-4.86%
Cellectar Biosciences Inc

DBOEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBOEY has been loosely correlated with DBOEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBOEY jumps, then DBOEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBOEY
1D Price
Change %
DBOEY100%
-2.03%
DBOEF - DBOEY
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
MQBKY - DBOEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
LDNXF - DBOEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.54%
BITF - DBOEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAFG - DBOEY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HAFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAFG and CIIHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAFG and CIIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFG
1D Price
Change %
HAFG100%
N/A
CIIHF - HAFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - HAFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBOEY - HAFG
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
HEXEY - HAFG
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIG - HAFG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More