Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBOCX vs RLBFX
DBOCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts DBOCX vs RLBFX
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity C
Price$25.74
Change-$0.29 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.32M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
DBOCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBOCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBOCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. DBOCX (292M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than DBOCX: RLBFX (1.97) vs DBOCX (0.39). DBOCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: DBOCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). DBOCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). DBOCX (46.25) and RLBFX (44.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBOCX: RLBFX (250) vs DBOCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. DBOCX (4.26). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. DBOCX (8.01).
| DBOCX | RLBFX | DBOCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.29 | 700% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.382 | 16.507 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.97 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 10.28 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.69 | 44.74 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | 43.06 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.14 | 81.39 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement