Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs TRQZX
DBMCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs TRQZX
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
Price$14.69
Change-$9.84 (-40.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.78M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
DBMCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. DBMCX (911M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: TRQZX (0.74) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: DBMCX (17 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). DBMCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.92 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: TRQZX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. DBMCX (-37.33). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. DBMCX (-57.36).
| DBMCX | TRQZX | DBMCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.61 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.301 | -0.061 | -15,241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 911M | 25.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -37.33 | -5.09 | 734% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.03 | 2.38 | -1,095% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.36 | -13.86 | 414% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement