Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
Price$13.83
Change-$0.29 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.82M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. DBMCX (894M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). DBMCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.92 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. DBMCX (-39.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. DBMCX (-53.75).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.04 | 5,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.04 | 5,257% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -35.643 | 14.415 | -247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 894M | 41B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -39.45 | 7.13 | -553% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.42 | 61.85 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -53.75 | 33.85 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.22 | 118.92 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement