Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
Price$14.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets937.45M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DBMCX (937M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.57) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). DBMCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.92 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. DBMCX (-33.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.22 vs. DBMCX (-55.48).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.04 | 5,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.04 | 5,257% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.640 | 4.897 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 937M | 40.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -33.02 | 17.16 | -192% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.99 | 60.27 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.48 | 24.22 | -229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.27 | 156.77 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement