Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
Price$14.69
Change-$9.84 (-40.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.78M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. DBMCX (911M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.56) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). DBMCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.92 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. DBMCX (-37.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. DBMCX (-57.36).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.04 | 5,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.04 | 5,257% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.301 | 3.050 | 305% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 911M | 40.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -37.33 | 10.51 | -355% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.03 | 48.06 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.36 | 19.23 | -298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.56 | 157.02 | 12% |