Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMAX vs TRQZX
DBMAX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts DBMAX vs TRQZX
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr A
Price$21.23
Change-$9.29 (-30.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.78M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
DBMAX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMAX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMAX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. DBMAX (911M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than DBMAX: TRQZX (0.74) vs DBMAX (0.00). DBMAX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: DBMAX (17 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). DBMAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). DBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.92 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMAX: TRQZX (0) vs DBMAX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. DBMAX (-26.79). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. DBMAX (-47.53).
| DBMAX | TRQZX | DBMAX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.61 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.433 | -0.061 | -15,458% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 911M | 25.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.79 | -5.09 | 527% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.13 | 2.38 | -510% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.53 | -13.86 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement