DBIN
Price
$34.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.73%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
387.11M
DBSDF
Price
$35.21
Change
-$2.13 (-5.70%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
66.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBIN vs DBSDF

Header iconDBIN vs DBSDF Comparison
Open Charts DBIN vs DBSDFBanner chart's image
Dacotah Banks
Price$34.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.73%)
Volume$300
Capitalization387.11M
DBS Group Holdings
Price$35.21
Change-$2.13 (-5.70%)
Volume$3.83K
Capitalization66.63B
DBIN vs DBSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBIN vs. DBSDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBIN is a Hold and DBSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DBIN: $34.00 vs. DBSDF: $34.97)
Brand notoriety: DBIN and DBSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBIN: 21% vs. DBSDF: 65%
Market capitalization -- DBIN: $387.11M vs. DBSDF: $66.63B
DBIN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $387.11M. DBSDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBSDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DBIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBSDF is a better buy in the long-term than DBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBIN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBSDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DBSDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBSDF is a better buy in the short-term than DBIN.

Price Growth

DBIN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.68% price change this week, while DBSDF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDF($66.6B) has a higher market cap than DBIN($387M). DBIN has higher P/E ratio than DBSDF: DBIN (10.29) vs DBSDF (7.68). DBSDF YTD gains are higher at: 4.889 vs. DBIN (1.993). DBIN has less debt than DBSDF: DBIN (4M) vs DBSDF (47.1B). DBSDF has higher revenues than DBIN: DBSDF (17.7B) vs DBIN (144M).
DBINDBSDFDBIN / DBSDF
Capitalization387M66.6B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.9934.88941%
P/E Ratio10.297.68134%
Revenue144M17.7B1%
Total Cash57.4MN/A-
Total Debt4M47.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBIN vs DBSDF: Fundamental Ratings
DBIN
DBSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
849
SMR RATING
1..100
313
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBIN's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBSDF (92). This means that DBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBIN (84). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than DBIN’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as DBIN (31). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to DBIN’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DBIN (55). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to DBIN’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as DBIN (43). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to DBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBINDBSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCGN0.960.03
+3.30%
Ocugen
CSIQ12.520.07
+0.56%
Canadian Solar
TJX125.860.55
+0.44%
TJX Companies
ADC71.97-0.09
-0.12%
Agree Realty Corp
ITRM0.96N/A
-0.42%
Iterum Therapeutics plc

DBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBIN and WFCL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBIN and WFCL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBIN
1D Price
Change %
DBIN100%
-0.73%
WFCL - DBIN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDY - DBIN
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
CZFS - DBIN
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
CZBC - DBIN
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDF - DBIN
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.35%
More

DBSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDF has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBSDF jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDF
1D Price
Change %
DBSDF100%
-6.35%
DNBBF - DBSDF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
FKKFY - DBSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOVEY - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
CHBAF - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVCB - DBSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More