2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
DBAW vs WDS
DBAW vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts DBAW vs WDS
Xtrackers MSCI All World exUS Hdg Eq ETF
Price$33.55
Change+$0.31 (+0.93%)
Volume$10.43K
Net Assets162.37M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$12.81
Change+$0.37 (+2.97%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization37.83B
DBAW vs WDS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBAW vs. WDS commentary
Apr 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBAW is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDS: Fundamental Ratings
WDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DBAW | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DBAW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBAW has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DBAW jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBAW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAW | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| BN - DBAW | 66% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| OUT - DBAW | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| BAM - DBAW | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| WDS - DBAW | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| SHEL - DBAW | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
More | ||||
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDS | 100% | +2.97% | ||
| FANG - WDS | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.70% | ||
| CHRD - WDS | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| HES - WDS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| MTDR - WDS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| PR - WDS | 62% Loosely correlated | +9.17% | ||
More | ||||