DB
Price
$29.25
Change
+$0.16 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
31.37B
19 days until earnings call
MFG
Price
$5.63
Change
+$0.04 (+0.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.2B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DB vs MFG

Header iconDB vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts DB vs MFGBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$29.25
Change+$0.16 (+0.55%)
Volume$1.83M
Capitalization31.37B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$5.63
Change+$0.04 (+0.72%)
Volume$2.04M
Capitalization49.2B
DB vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DB vs. MFG commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a Hold and MFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DB: $29.25 vs. MFG: $5.63)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. MFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 64% vs. MFG: 69%
Market capitalization -- DB: $31.37B vs. MFG: $49.2B
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.37B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than DB.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.34% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than DB($31.4B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than DB: MFG (11.31) vs DB (5.25). DB YTD gains are higher at: 71.554 vs. MFG (15.133). DB has less debt than MFG: DB (144B) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than DB: MFG (2.88T) vs DB (31.2B).
DBMFGDB / MFG
Capitalization31.4B49.2B64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD71.55415.133473%
P/E Ratio5.2511.3146%
Revenue31.2B2.88T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt144B20.53T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
DB
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1619
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (29) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (49). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (19). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (4). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (45). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

DB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (70). This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMET34.130.22
+0.65%
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
RSPH29.230.05
+0.15%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF
DBP75.73-0.36
-0.47%
Invesco DB Precious Metals
GLDM66.04-0.43
-0.65%
SPDR® Gold MiniShares
AIBD9.94-0.29
-2.83%
Direxion Daily AI And Big Data Bear 2X

DB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DB
1D Price
Change %
DB100%
+0.55%
NWG - DB
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
LYG - DB
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
MFG - DB
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
BLX - DB
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
HBAN - DB
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.72%
NWG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
HBAN - MFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
DB - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
AUB - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
SNV - MFG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More