DB
Price
$35.20
Change
-$0.12 (-0.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
67.96B
53 days until earnings call
MFG
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
81.62B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DB vs MFG

Header iconDB vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts DB vs MFGBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$35.20
Change-$0.12 (-0.34%)
Volume$3.15M
Capitalization67.96B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization81.62B
DB vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DB vs. MFG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a StrongBuy and MFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DB: $35.20 vs. MFG: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. MFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 124% vs. MFG: 70%
Market capitalization -- DB: $67.96B vs. MFG: $81.62B
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $67.96B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than DB.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($81.6B) has a higher market cap than DB($68B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than DB: MFG (13.69) vs DB (12.34). DB YTD gains are higher at: 106.452 vs. MFG (33.129). DB has less debt than MFG: DB (132B) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than DB: MFG (3.61T) vs DB (31B).
DBMFGDB / MFG
Capitalization68B81.6B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD106.45233.129321%
P/E Ratio12.3413.6990%
Revenue31B3.61T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt132B22.19T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
DB
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1115
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (72). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (15). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (4). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (43). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

DB's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (25). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALLW27.160.20
+0.74%
SPDR Bridgewater ALL Weather ETF
XFIV49.760.15
+0.30%
BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF
VOE172.820.28
+0.16%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
AWAY21.940.02
+0.10%
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
XBIL50.080.03
+0.06%
F/m US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF

DB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DB
1D Price
Change %
DB100%
-0.34%
NWG - DB
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
LYG - DB
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
MFG - DB
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
BLX - DB
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BSAC - DB
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.46%
NWG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
DB - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
HBAN - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
WNEB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
TFC - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More