DB
Price
$27.54
Change
-$0.68 (-2.41%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
31.37B
39 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$36.01
Change
-$0.97 (-2.62%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DB vs IFS

Header iconDB vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts DB vs IFSBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$27.54
Change-$0.68 (-2.41%)
Volume$2.81M
Capitalization31.37B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$36.01
Change-$0.97 (-2.62%)
Volume$175.19K
Capitalization2.77B
DB vs IFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DB vs. IFS commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a Hold and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (DB: $27.54 vs. IFS: $36.01)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. IFS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 96% vs. IFS: 73%
Market capitalization -- DB: $31.37B vs. IFS: $2.77B
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.37B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than IFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than DB.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.10% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DB($31.4B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). IFS has higher P/E ratio than DB: IFS (9.76) vs DB (5.25). DB YTD gains are higher at: 61.525 vs. IFS (26.666). IFS has less debt than DB: IFS (10.4B) vs DB (144B). DB has higher revenues than IFS: DB (31.2B) vs IFS (6.82B).
DBIFSDB / IFS
Capitalization31.4B2.77B1,132%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD61.52526.666231%
P/E Ratio5.259.7654%
Revenue31.2B6.82B457%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt144B10.4B1,385%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
DB
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1533
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
938
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (27) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (79) in the null industry. This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (33) in the null industry. This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

DB's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (42) in the null industry. This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

DB's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (38) in the null industry. This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSS99.640.42
+0.42%
Federal Signal Corp
VGAS3.22N/A
N/A
Verde Clean Fuels
CEG296.89-3.49
-1.16%
Constellation Energy Corp
CZNC18.32-0.52
-2.76%
Citizens & Northern Corp
CWH17.89-0.82
-4.41%
Camping World Holdings

DB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DB
1D Price
Change %
DB100%
-2.41%
NWG - DB
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
LYG - DB
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
MFG - DB
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
BLX - DB
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
WTFC - DB
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-2.62%
BSAC - IFS
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
BAP - IFS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BCH - IFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
BWB - IFS
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
DB - IFS
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
More