DB
Price
$35.72
Change
+$0.52 (+1.48%)
Updated
Sep 9, 12:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.4B
50 days until earnings call
GGAL
Price
$31.73
Change
+$1.09 (+3.56%)
Updated
Sep 9, 12:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.55B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DB vs GGAL

Header iconDB vs GGAL Comparison
Open Charts DB vs GGALBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$35.72
Change+$0.52 (+1.48%)
Volume$4.26K
Capitalization67.4B
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA
Price$31.73
Change+$1.09 (+3.56%)
Volume$8.71K
Capitalization6.55B
DB vs GGAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DB vs. GGAL commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a StrongBuy and GGAL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (DB: $35.20 vs. GGAL: $30.65)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. GGAL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 103% vs. GGAL: 696%
Market capitalization -- DB: $67.4B vs. GGAL: $6.55B
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $67.4B. GGAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GGAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than GGAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GGAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the short-term than GGAL.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -21.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

GGAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DB($67.4B) has a higher market cap than GGAL($6.55B). DB has higher P/E ratio than GGAL: DB (12.28) vs GGAL (4.48). DB YTD gains are higher at: 106.452 vs. GGAL (-50.248). DB has less debt than GGAL: DB (132B) vs GGAL (2.22T).
DBGGALDB / GGAL
Capitalization67.4B6.55B1,029%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD106.452-50.248-212%
P/E Ratio12.284.48274%
Revenue31BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt132B2.22T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs GGAL: Fundamental Ratings
DB
GGAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1164
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3989
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGAL's Valuation (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DB (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGAL (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DB (4) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGAL (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

DB's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGAL (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DB’s stock grew significantly faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBGGAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBAW38.510.17
+0.44%
Xtrackers MSCI All World exUS Hdg Eq ETF
IUSB46.780.14
+0.30%
iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF
RZB24.860.02
+0.08%
Reinsurance Group of America
XBIL50.07-0.01
-0.02%
F/m US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF
NETL24.93-0.14
-0.57%
Fundamental Income Net Lease Rl Estt ETF

DB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DB
1D Price
Change %
DB100%
N/A
NWG - DB
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
LYG - DB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
MFG - DB
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
BLX - DB
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
BSAC - DB
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More

GGAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAL
1D Price
Change %
GGAL100%
-23.57%
BMA - GGAL
93%
Closely correlated
-23.48%
BBAR - GGAL
90%
Closely correlated
-24.41%
SUPV - GGAL
90%
Closely correlated
-23.97%
BAP - GGAL
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
DB - GGAL
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More