DB
Price
$16.73
Change
+$0.33 (+2.01%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
76 days until earnings call
FLIC
Price
$14.02
Change
-$0.06 (-0.43%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DB vs FLIC

Header iconDB vs FLIC Comparison
Open Charts DB vs FLICBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$16.73
Change+$0.33 (+2.01%)
Volume$1.92M
CapitalizationN/A
First of Long Island
Price$14.02
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
Volume$67.82K
CapitalizationN/A
DB vs FLIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FLIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DB vs. FLIC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a StrongBuy and FLIC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (DB: $16.73 vs. FLIC: $14.02)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. FLIC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 107% vs. FLIC: 56%
Market capitalization -- DB: $31.37B vs. FLIC: $249.11M
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.37B. FLIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $249.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFLIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FLIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than FLIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLIC is a better buy in the short-term than DB.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.90% price change this week, while FLIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

FLIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DB($31.4B) has a higher market cap than FLIC($249M). FLIC has higher P/E ratio than DB: FLIC (9.28) vs DB (5.25). DB YTD gains are higher at: 23.469 vs. FLIC (11.911). FLIC has less debt than DB: FLIC (567M) vs DB (144B). DB has higher revenues than FLIC: DB (31.2B) vs FLIC (93M).
DBFLICDB / FLIC
Capitalization31.4B249M12,610%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.46911.911197%
P/E Ratio5.259.2857%
Revenue31.2B93M33,548%
Total CashN/A45.8M-
Total Debt144B567M25,397%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs FLIC: Fundamental Ratings
DB
FLIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6277
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1716
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FLIC (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to FLIC’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLIC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLIC’s over the last 12 months.

DB's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLIC (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLIC’s over the last 12 months.

FLIC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DB (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FLIC’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

FLIC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DB (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FLIC’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBFLIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FLIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

DB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DB has been loosely correlated with CPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DB jumps, then CPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DB
1D Price
Change %
DB100%
+2.01%
CPF - DB
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
FLIC - DB
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
UMBF - DB
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
TOWN - DB
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
FFIN - DB
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More

FLIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLIC has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLIC jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLIC
1D Price
Change %
FLIC100%
-0.43%
HOPE - FLIC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
UBSI - FLIC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
TOWN - FLIC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
OCFC - FLIC
83%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
FFBC - FLIC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More