DAVA
Price
$17.46
Change
-$0.54 (-3.00%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.2B
52 days until earnings call
PMCUF
Price
$129.25
Change
+$5.82 (+4.72%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Ad is loading...

DAVA vs PMCUF

Header iconDAVA vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts DAVA vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Endava
Price$17.46
Change-$0.54 (-3.00%)
Volume$2.13K
Capitalization2.2B
Pro Medicus
Price$129.25
Change+$5.82 (+4.72%)
Volume$560
Capitalization4.8B
DAVA vs PMCUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (DAVA: $18.00 vs. PMCUF: $129.25)
Brand notoriety: DAVA and PMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAVA: 152% vs. PMCUF: 122%
Market capitalization -- DAVA: $2.2B vs. PMCUF: $4.8B
DAVA [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.2B. PMCUF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DAVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than DAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

DAVA (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.96% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAVA is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($4.8B) has a higher market cap than DAVA($2.2B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than DAVA: PMCUF (140.85) vs DAVA (25.73). PMCUF YTD gains are higher at: -16.758 vs. DAVA (-41.748). PMCUF (78.6M) and DAVA (76.8M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . DAVA has more cash in the bank: 199M vs. PMCUF (90.6M). PMCUF has less debt than DAVA: PMCUF (2.28M) vs DAVA (59.4M). DAVA has higher revenues than PMCUF: DAVA (765M) vs PMCUF (106M).
DAVAPMCUFDAVA / PMCUF
Capitalization2.2B4.8B46%
EBITDA76.8M78.6M98%
Gain YTD-41.748-16.758249%
P/E Ratio25.73140.8518%
Revenue765M106M722%
Total Cash199M90.6M220%
Total Debt59.4M2.28M2,606%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAVA vs PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
DAVA
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
391
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
8919
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DAVA's Valuation (85) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PMCUF (93) in the null industry. This means that DAVA’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAVA (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAVA’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAVA (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAVA’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAVA (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PMCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAVA’s over the last 12 months.

DAVA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PMCUF (14) in the null industry. This means that DAVA’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DAVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

DAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAVA has been closely correlated with LKRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DAVA jumps, then LKRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAVA
1D Price
Change %
DAVA100%
-7.83%
LKRY - DAVA
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
TMSNY - DAVA
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
DBX - DAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
EVTC - DAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.56%
EVCM - DAVA
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMCUF has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMCUF jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
+4.71%
BMBL - PMCUF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
OCLCF - PMCUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
DAVA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.83%
VCSA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More