DAUGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.85M
GSCCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
419.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAUGF vs GSCCF

Header iconDAUGF vs GSCCF Comparison
Open Charts DAUGF vs GSCCFBanner chart's image
Desert Gold Ventures
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.5K
Capitalization8.85M
Ioneer
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$15.25K
Capitalization419.26M
DAUGF vs GSCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAUGF vs. GSCCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAUGF is a Hold and GSCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DAUGF: $0.06 vs. GSCCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: DAUGF and GSCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAUGF: 115% vs. GSCCF: 22%
Market capitalization -- DAUGF: $8.85M vs. GSCCF: $419.26M
DAUGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.85M. GSCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $419.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAUGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAUGF is a better buy in the long-term than GSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAUGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAUGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSCCF is a better buy in the short-term than DAUGF.

Price Growth

DAUGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSCCF($419M) has a higher market cap than DAUGF($8.85M). DAUGF YTD gains are higher at: 78.635 vs. GSCCF (-26.619). DAUGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.43M vs. GSCCF (-9.59M). GSCCF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. DAUGF (853K). DAUGF has less debt than GSCCF: DAUGF (146K) vs GSCCF (300K).
DAUGFGSCCFDAUGF / GSCCF
Capitalization8.85M419M2%
EBITDA-2.43M-9.59M25%
Gain YTD78.635-26.619-295%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash853K69.3M1%
Total Debt146K300K49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAUGF vs GSCCF: Fundamental Ratings
DAUGF
GSCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3785
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DAUGF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as GSCCF (100). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

DAUGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GSCCF (100). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

DAUGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSCCF (85). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAUGF (100). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DAUGFGSCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BQCNF110.00N/A
N/A
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
DGDCF0.10N/A
N/A
Dynasty Gold Corp.
LEIC0.15N/A
N/A
Lead Innovation Corporation
KPLIF0.27N/A
N/A
Keppel Infrastructure Trust
SMOPF1.85N/A
N/A
SMARTOPTICS GROUP AS

DAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAUGF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAUGF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAUGF
1D Price
Change %
DAUGF100%
N/A
ABRMF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRAXF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACQF - DAUGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABCFF - DAUGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+32.14%
More

GSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSCCF and DAUGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSCCF and DAUGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSCCF
1D Price
Change %
GSCCF100%
+11.54%
DAUGF - GSCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VCUFF - GSCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
GTCDF - GSCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - GSCCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - GSCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
More