DAUGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.85M
DBLVF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
54.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAUGF vs DBLVF

Header iconDAUGF vs DBLVF Comparison
Open Charts DAUGF vs DBLVFBanner chart's image
Desert Gold Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.85M
Doubleview Gold
Price$0.42
Change-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Volume$80.57K
Capitalization54.77M
DAUGF vs DBLVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAUGF vs. DBLVF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAUGF is a Hold and DBLVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DAUGF: $0.05 vs. DBLVF: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: DAUGF and DBLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAUGF: 1% vs. DBLVF: 307%
Market capitalization -- DAUGF: $8.85M vs. DBLVF: $54.77M
DAUGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.85M. DBLVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $54.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAUGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDBLVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DBLVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBLVF is a better buy in the long-term than DAUGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAUGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBLVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAUGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DBLVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAUGF is a better buy in the short-term than DBLVF.

Price Growth

DAUGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.88% price change this week, while DBLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBLVF($54.8M) has a higher market cap than DAUGF($8.85M). DBLVF YTD gains are higher at: 64.202 vs. DAUGF (57.864). DBLVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.7M vs. DAUGF (-2.43M). DBLVF has more cash in the bank: 2.26M vs. DAUGF (853K). DAUGF has less debt than DBLVF: DAUGF (146K) vs DBLVF (626K). DAUGF (0) and DBLVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DAUGFDBLVFDAUGF / DBLVF
Capitalization8.85M54.8M16%
EBITDA-2.43M-1.7M143%
Gain YTD57.86464.20290%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash853K2.26M38%
Total Debt146K626K23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAUGF vs DBLVF: Fundamental Ratings
DAUGF
DBLVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBLVF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (82). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

DAUGF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as DBLVF (54). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to DBLVF’s over the last 12 months.

DAUGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DBLVF (100). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to DBLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DAUGFDBLVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGOUF2.17N/A
N/A
Bang & Olufsen AS
CPYYF2.30N/A
N/A
Centrica Plc
DURYY5.19N/A
N/A
Durr AG
COPR0.35N/A
N/A
Idaho Copper Corporation
GFCOF0.70N/A
N/A
Intellistake Technologies Corp

DAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAUGF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAUGF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAUGF
1D Price
Change %
DAUGF100%
N/A
ABRMF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRAXF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+8.57%
GTCDF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACQF - DAUGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABCFF - DAUGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DBLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBLVF and UUSAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBLVF and UUSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBLVF
1D Price
Change %
DBLVF100%
-1.86%
UUSAF - DBLVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRRF - DBLVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
FSUMF - DBLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
DAUGF - DBLVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVVUF - DBLVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More