DAR
Price
$31.84
Change
+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.97B
46 days until earnings call
INGR
Price
$121.23
Change
+$0.23 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.77B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAR vs INGR

Header iconDAR vs INGR Comparison
Open Charts DAR vs INGRBanner chart's image
Darling Ingredients
Price$31.84
Change+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Volume$2.05K
Capitalization4.97B
Ingredion
Price$121.23
Change+$0.23 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization7.77B
DAR vs INGR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAR vs. INGR commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a Hold and INGR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DAR: $31.43 vs. INGR: $121.01)
Brand notoriety: DAR and INGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAR: 95% vs. INGR: 139%
Market capitalization -- DAR: $4.97B vs. INGR: $7.77B
DAR [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.97B. INGR’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGR is a better buy in the long-term than DAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAR’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAR’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • INGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INGR is a better buy in the short-term than DAR.

Price Growth

DAR (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while INGR (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +184.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

INGR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.84% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INGR($7.77B) has a higher market cap than DAR($4.97B). DAR has higher P/E ratio than INGR: DAR (48.35) vs INGR (11.82). DAR YTD gains are higher at: -6.708 vs. INGR (-10.462). INGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.2B vs. DAR (801M). INGR has more cash in the bank: 868M vs. DAR (94.6M). INGR has less debt than DAR: INGR (1.79B) vs DAR (4.22B). INGR has higher revenues than DAR: INGR (7.32B) vs DAR (5.7B).
DARINGRDAR / INGR
Capitalization4.97B7.77B64%
EBITDA801M1.2B67%
Gain YTD-6.708-10.46264%
P/E Ratio48.3511.82409%
Revenue5.7B7.32B78%
Total Cash94.6M868M11%
Total Debt4.22B1.79B236%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAR vs INGR: Fundamental Ratings
DAR
INGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5674
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
8951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8478
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
664
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INGR's Valuation (34) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (89). This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAR (100). This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's SMR Rating (51) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (89). This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as DAR (84). This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

DAR's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INGR (64). This means that DAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than INGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DARINGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JJETF6.00N/A
N/A
Barclays Bank PLC
MLPR58.42-0.05
-0.09%
ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Aln MLP ETN
ESN16.92-0.06
-0.34%
Essential 40 Stock ETF
JRS8.02-0.06
-0.74%
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund
FWD99.24-0.74
-0.74%
AB Disruptors ETF

DAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAR has been loosely correlated with INGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAR jumps, then INGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAR
1D Price
Change %
DAR100%
+1.13%
INGR - DAR
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
FLO - DAR
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
K - DAR
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CAG - DAR
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
HRL - DAR
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More

INGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with MKC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then MKC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGR
1D Price
Change %
INGR100%
-0.94%
MKC - INGR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
POST - INGR
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
GIS - INGR
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.29%
FLO - INGR
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
CAG - INGR
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.43%
More