DAR
Price
$30.85
Change
+$0.42 (+1.38%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.43B
56 days until earnings call
FLO
Price
$18.89
Change
-$0.73 (-3.72%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5B
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DAR vs FLO

Header iconDAR vs FLO Comparison
Open Charts DAR vs FLOBanner chart's image
Darling Ingredients
Price$30.85
Change+$0.42 (+1.38%)
Volume$34.37K
Capitalization7.43B
Flowers Foods
Price$18.89
Change-$0.73 (-3.72%)
Volume$22.68K
Capitalization5B
DAR vs FLO Comparison Chart
Loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAR vs. FLO commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a Buy and FLO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (DAR: $30.43 vs. FLO: $19.62)
Brand notoriety: DAR and FLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAR: 123% vs. FLO: 134%
Market capitalization -- DAR: $7.43B vs. FLO: $5B
DAR [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.43B. FLO’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than DAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than DAR.

Price Growth

DAR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -11.59% price change this week, while FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAR is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

FLO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.74% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAR($7.43B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than DAR: FLO (40.74) vs DAR (11.38). FLO YTD gains are higher at: -3.810 vs. DAR (-9.676). DAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. FLO (345M). DAR has more cash in the bank: 127M vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than DAR: FLO (1.35B) vs DAR (4.64B). DAR has higher revenues than FLO: DAR (6.79B) vs FLO (5.09B).
DARFLODAR / FLO
Capitalization7.43B5B149%
EBITDA1.48B345M429%
Gain YTD-9.676-3.810254%
P/E Ratio11.3840.7428%
Revenue6.79B5.09B133%
Total Cash127M22.5M564%
Total Debt4.64B1.35B343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAR vs FLO: Fundamental Ratings
DAR
FLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6770
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9481
SMR RATING
1..100
8150
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9694
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAR (83) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DAR (94) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DAR (81) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Price Growth Rating (94) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DAR (96) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

DAR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DARFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X78532.000000-2069.039000
-2.57%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY560.58-15.34
-2.66%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL227.48-11.59
-4.85%
Apple
GME22.42-1.58
-6.58%
GameStop Corp
TSLA222.15-40.52
-15.43%
Tesla

DAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAR has been loosely correlated with INGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAR jumps, then INGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAR
1D Price
Change %
DAR100%
-5.44%
INGR - DAR
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
FLO - DAR
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
K - DAR
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAG - DAR
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
HRL - DAR
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+1.13%
GIS - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
CPB - FLO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
CAG - FLO
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
KHC - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
SJM - FLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More