DAR
Price
$35.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 11:42 AM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
FLO
Price
$20.92
Change
+$0.12 (+0.58%)
Updated
Dec 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DAR vs FLO

Header iconDAR vs FLO Comparison
Open Charts DAR vs FLOBanner chart's image
Darling Ingredients
Price$35.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Flowers Foods
Price$20.92
Change+$0.12 (+0.58%)
Volume$16.96K
CapitalizationN/A
DAR vs FLO Comparison Chart
Loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAR vs. FLO commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a StrongBuy and FLO is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DAR: $35.32 vs. FLO: $20.92)
Brand notoriety: DAR and FLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAR: 139% vs. FLO: 105%
Market capitalization -- DAR: $7.43B vs. FLO: $5B
DAR [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.43B. FLO’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DAR and FLO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DAR and FLO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DAR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAR is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.63% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAR($7.43B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than DAR: FLO (40.74) vs DAR (11.38). FLO YTD gains are higher at: -3.691 vs. DAR (-29.133). DAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. FLO (345M). DAR has more cash in the bank: 127M vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than DAR: FLO (1.35B) vs DAR (4.64B). DAR has higher revenues than FLO: DAR (6.79B) vs FLO (5.09B).
DARFLODAR / FLO
Capitalization7.43B5B149%
EBITDA1.48B345M429%
Gain YTD-29.133-3.691789%
P/E Ratio11.3840.7428%
Revenue6.79B5.09B133%
Total Cash127M22.5M564%
Total Debt4.64B1.35B343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAR vs FLO: Fundamental Ratings
DAR
FLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5763
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7465
SMR RATING
1..100
5675
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
694
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (14) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAR (85) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DAR (74) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

DAR's SMR Rating (56) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FLO (75) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Price Growth Rating (71) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DAR (81) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

DAR's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (94) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DARFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

DAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAR has been loosely correlated with NATR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAR jumps, then NATR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAR
1D Price
Change %
DAR100%
+4.19%
NATR - DAR
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
INGR - DAR
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
CENTA - DAR
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.03%
CENT - DAR
33%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
FLO - DAR
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-1.93%
GIS - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
CAG - FLO
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
CPB - FLO
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
MDLZ - FLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
SJM - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
More