Advertisement
DAO vs MRLWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAO is a Hold and MRLWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DAO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MRLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DAO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRLWF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DAO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MRLWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
DAO (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +14.46% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +24.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
DAO is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.54% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+24.94% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| DAO | MRLWF | DAO / MRLWF | |
| Capitalization | 1.2B | 460M | 261% |
| EBITDA | 224M | 43.1M | 520% |
| Gain YTD | 35.811 | 47.462 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.36 | 87.51 | 43% |
| Revenue | 5.53B | 408M | 1,356% |
| Total Cash | 418M | 30.8M | 1,357% |
| Total Debt | 1.82B | 21.6M | 8,440% |
| DAO | MRLWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LIFEX | 16.68 | 0.09 | +0.54% |
| Domini Sustainable Solutions Ins | |||
| TEDRX | 31.38 | 0.09 | +0.29% |
| Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R | |||
| AMINX | 69.13 | N/A | N/A |
| Amana Income Institutional | |||
| SMUYX | 9.96 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
| SEI Multi-Strategy Alternative Y (SIMT) | |||
| FSHOX | 128.50 | -0.51 | -0.40% |
| Fidelity Select Construction & Housing | |||
DAO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAO | 100% | +2.97% | ||
| MRLWF - DAO | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CPBLF - DAO | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - DAO | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COUR - DAO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ARMK - DAO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
MRLWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRLWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRLWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CPBLF - MRLWF | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - MRLWF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DAO - MRLWF | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| GLDAF - MRLWF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DCMDF - MRLWF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||