DAO
Price
$8.72
Change
+$0.37 (+4.43%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
67 days until earnings call
MRLWF
Price
$5.81
Change
-$0.04 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
459.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAO vs MRLWF

Header iconDAO vs MRLWF Comparison
Open Charts DAO vs MRLWFBanner chart's image
Youdao
Price$8.72
Change+$0.37 (+4.43%)
Volume$81.61K
Capitalization1.04B
Marlowe
Price$5.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.68%)
Volume$325
Capitalization459.8M
DAO vs MRLWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAO vs. MRLWF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAO is a Hold and MRLWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DAO: $8.72 vs. MRLWF: $5.81)
Brand notoriety: DAO and MRLWF are both not notable
DAO represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while MRLWF is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAO: 97% vs. MRLWF: 16%
Market capitalization -- DAO: $1.04B vs. MRLWF: $459.8M
DAO [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $1.04B. MRLWF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $459.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRLWF is a better buy in the long-term than DAO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRLWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MRLWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRLWF is a better buy in the short-term than DAO.

Price Growth

DAO (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -2.79% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAO is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.02% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAO($1.04B) has a higher market cap than MRLWF($460M). MRLWF has higher P/E ratio than DAO: MRLWF (87.51) vs DAO (32.27). MRLWF YTD gains are higher at: 47.462 vs. DAO (17.838). DAO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 297M vs. MRLWF (43.1M). DAO has more cash in the bank: 611M vs. MRLWF (30.8M). MRLWF has less debt than DAO: MRLWF (21.6M) vs DAO (1.83B). DAO has higher revenues than MRLWF: DAO (5.63B) vs MRLWF (408M).
DAOMRLWFDAO / MRLWF
Capitalization1.04B460M227%
EBITDA297M43.1M689%
Gain YTD17.83847.46238%
P/E Ratio32.2787.5137%
Revenue5.63B408M1,379%
Total Cash611M30.8M1,984%
Total Debt1.83B21.6M8,468%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAO: Fundamental Ratings
DAO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DAOMRLWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITHCX40.370.26
+0.65%
Invesco Technology C
SNWRX70.800.06
+0.08%
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value R6
JNBCX10.27N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Income Builder C
SGICX17.19N/A
N/A
SGI US Large Cap Equity C
FAFSX38.14-0.56
-1.45%
Fidelity Advisor Financials M

DAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAO
1D Price
Change %
DAO100%
+4.43%
MRLWF - DAO
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPBLF - DAO
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIGTF - DAO
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COUR - DAO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
ARMK - DAO
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More

MRLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRLWF
1D Price
Change %
MRLWF100%
N/A
CPBLF - MRLWF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIGTF - MRLWF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAO - MRLWF
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.43%
GLDAF - MRLWF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCMDF - MRLWF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More