DAO
Price
$6.54
Change
-$0.27 (-3.96%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
499.34M
39 days until earnings call
MRLWF
Price
$3.96
Change
-$0.04 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
699.98M
Ad is loading...

DAO vs MRLWF

Header iconDAO vs MRLWF Comparison
Open Charts DAO vs MRLWFBanner chart's image
Youdao
Price$6.54
Change-$0.27 (-3.96%)
Volume$50.47K
Capitalization499.34M
Marlowe
Price$3.96
Change-$0.04 (-1.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization699.98M
DAO vs MRLWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAO vs. MRLWF commentary
Jan 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAO is a StrongBuy and MRLWF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 13, 2025
Stock price -- (DAO: $6.54 vs. MRLWF: $3.96)
Brand notoriety: DAO and MRLWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAO: 38% vs. MRLWF: 1%
Market capitalization -- DAO: $499.34M vs. MRLWF: $699.98M
DAO [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $499.34M. MRLWF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $699.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DAO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRLWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRLWF is a better buy in the long-term than DAO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DAO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DAO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -7.63% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAO is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.46% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRLWF($700M) has a higher market cap than DAO($499M). MRLWF YTD gains are higher at: 0.508 vs. DAO (-11.622). MRLWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.3M vs. DAO (-513.47M). DAO has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. MRLWF (19.8M). MRLWF has less debt than DAO: MRLWF (204M) vs DAO (1.54B). DAO has higher revenues than MRLWF: DAO (5.36B) vs MRLWF (404M).
DAOMRLWFDAO / MRLWF
Capitalization499M700M71%
EBITDA-513.47M49.3M-1,042%
Gain YTD-11.6220.508-2,289%
P/E RatioN/A3333.33-
Revenue5.36B404M1,327%
Total Cash360M19.8M1,818%
Total Debt1.54B204M753%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DAO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA394.74-0.20
-0.05%
Tesla
BTC.X94566.590000-134.859380
-0.14%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY580.49-9.00
-1.53%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME32.31-0.65
-1.97%
GameStop Corp
AAPL236.85-5.85
-2.41%
Apple

DAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAO
1D Price
Change %
DAO100%
-3.96%
MRLWF - DAO
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPBLF - DAO
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIGTF - DAO
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOTU - DAO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
COUR - DAO
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
More

MRLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRLWF
1D Price
Change %
MRLWF100%
N/A
CPBLF - MRLWF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIGTF - MRLWF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAO - MRLWF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.96%
LWLW - MRLWF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLDAF - MRLWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
More