DAN
Price
$27.70
Change
+$0.64 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.16B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HSAI
Price
$28.67
Change
+$2.06 (+7.74%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs HSAI

Header iconDAN vs HSAI Comparison
Open Charts DAN vs HSAIBanner chart's image
Dana
Price$27.70
Change+$0.64 (+2.37%)
Volume$18.29K
Capitalization3.16B
Hesai Group American Depositary Share each ADS represents one
Price$28.67
Change+$2.06 (+7.74%)
Volume$58.58K
Capitalization4.18B
DAN vs HSAI Comparison Chart in %
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HSAI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. HSAI commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a Hold and HSAI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (DAN: $27.06 vs. HSAI: $26.61)
Brand notoriety: DAN and HSAI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 102% vs. HSAI: 74%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $3.16B vs. HSAI: $4.18B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.16B. HSAI’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $4.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $80.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHSAI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HSAI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the long-term than HSAI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSAI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HSAI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DAN and HSAI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.88% price change this week, while HSAI (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.71% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSAI($4.18B) has a higher market cap than DAN($3.16B). DAN (61.50) and HSAI (58.85) have similar P/E ratio . HSAI YTD gains are higher at: 18.795 vs. DAN (13.889). DAN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 801M vs. HSAI (476M). HSAI has more cash in the bank: 7.37B vs. DAN (414M). HSAI has less debt than DAN: HSAI (981M) vs DAN (3.53B). DAN has higher revenues than HSAI: DAN (9.96B) vs HSAI (2.75B).
DANHSAIDAN / HSAI
Capitalization3.16B4.18B76%
EBITDA801M476M168%
Gain YTD13.88918.79574%
P/E Ratio61.5058.85104%
Revenue9.96B2.75B362%
Total Cash414M7.37B6%
Total Debt3.53B981M360%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANHSAI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HSAI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEMRX12.800.05
+0.39%
Brandes Emerging Markets Value R6
MGICX37.450.07
+0.19%
MFS International Intrinsic Value C
BIGUX33.72N/A
N/A
Baron International Growth R6
ABPYX12.91-0.01
-0.08%
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor
JORCX18.64-0.04
-0.21%
Janus Henderson Global Select C

DAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAN
1D Price
Change %
DAN100%
-1.20%
ALV - DAN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
LEA - DAN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
APTV - DAN
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.03%
SMP - DAN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
BWA - DAN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More

HSAI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSAI has been loosely correlated with MNTHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSAI jumps, then MNTHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSAI
1D Price
Change %
HSAI100%
+0.99%
MNTHY - HSAI
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
DAN - HSAI
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
MBLY - HSAI
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
HYLN - HSAI
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
VLEEY - HSAI
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More