DAN
Price
$17.82
Change
+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
24 days until earnings call
GT
Price
$11.34
Change
+$0.26 (+2.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs GT

Header iconDAN vs GT Comparison
Open Charts DAN vs GTBanner chart's image
Dana
Price$17.82
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Volume$1.58M
Capitalization1.83B
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$11.34
Change+$0.26 (+2.35%)
Volume$4.08M
Capitalization3.9B
DAN vs GT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. GT commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a Hold and GT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DAN: $17.82 vs. GT: $11.34)
Brand notoriety: DAN: Not notable vs. GT: Notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 80% vs. GT: 66%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $1.83B vs. GT: $3.9B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $1.83B. GT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than DAN.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

GT is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GT($3.9B) has a higher market cap than DAN($1.83B). GT has higher P/E ratio than DAN: GT (769.23) vs DAN (48.62). DAN YTD gains are higher at: 56.218 vs. GT (26.000). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 856M vs. DAN (748M). GT has more cash in the bank: 902M vs. DAN (529M). DAN has less debt than GT: DAN (2.98B) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than DAN: GT (20.1B) vs DAN (10.6B).
DANGTDAN / GT
Capitalization1.83B3.9B47%
EBITDA748M856M87%
Gain YTD56.21826.000216%
P/E Ratio48.62769.236%
Revenue10.6B20.1B53%
Total Cash529M902M59%
Total Debt2.98B8.65B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN vs GT: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7989
SMR RATING
1..100
9183
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DAN's Valuation (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (89) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's SMR Rating (83) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as DAN (91) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (49) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (97) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFOZX18.750.22
+1.19%
Alger Mid Cap Focus Z
JMVYX37.830.16
+0.42%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R6
MIOIX33.170.07
+0.21%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp I
FFNAX13.710.02
+0.15%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A
PRKAX7.590.01
+0.13%
PGIM Real Estate Income A

DAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAN has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAN jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAN
1D Price
Change %
DAN100%
+0.22%
AXL - DAN
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWA - DAN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
ADNT - DAN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
LEA - DAN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
VC - DAN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
More

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
+2.35%
AXL - GT
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VC - GT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
BWA - GT
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
LEA - GT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
DAN - GT
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
More