DAC
Price
$101.79
Change
+$16.48 (+19.32%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.9B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFL
Price
$8.84
Change
+$1.66 (+23.12%)
Updated
Feb 3, 11:12 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.2B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAC vs SFL

Header iconDAC vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts DAC vs SFLBanner chart's image
Danaos
Price$101.79
Change+$16.48 (+19.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.9B
SFL
Price$8.84
Change+$1.66 (+23.12%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization1.2B
DAC vs SFL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAC vs. SFL commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAC is a Buy and SFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (DAC: $103.81 vs. SFL: $9.01)
Brand notoriety: DAC and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAC: 94% vs. SFL: 191%
Market capitalization -- DAC: $1.9B vs. SFL: $1.2B
DAC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.9B. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $36.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAC is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the short-term than DAC.

Price Growth

DAC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.43% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +9.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.87% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAC($1.9B) has a higher market cap than SFL($1.2B). SFL has higher P/E ratio than DAC: SFL (31.73) vs DAC (4.13). SFL YTD gains are higher at: 15.365 vs. DAC (10.225). DAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 668M vs. SFL (429M). DAC has less debt than SFL: DAC (753M) vs SFL (2.76B). DAC has higher revenues than SFL: DAC (1.03B) vs SFL (773M).
DACSFLDAC / SFL
Capitalization1.9B1.2B159%
EBITDA668M429M156%
Gain YTD10.22515.36567%
P/E Ratio4.1331.7313%
Revenue1.03B773M134%
Total Cash713MN/A-
Total Debt753M2.76B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAC vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
DAC
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2327
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2852
SMR RATING
1..100
5990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
165
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFL's Valuation (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DAC (25). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to DAC’s over the last 12 months.

DAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (52). This means that DAC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

DAC's SMR Rating (59) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (90). This means that DAC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

DAC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (47). This means that DAC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DAC (16). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to DAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DACSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCPSX90.150.78
+0.87%
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Svc
PWGAX20.110.04
+0.20%
PACE International Equity A
SVALX6.77N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div R6
SRUAX15.80N/A
N/A
Meeder Spectrum Adviser
FAPCX18.29N/A
N/A
Fidelity Intl Cptl Apprec K6

DAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAC has been closely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DAC jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAC
1D Price
Change %
DAC100%
+0.35%
GSL - DAC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
NMM - DAC
72%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
CMRE - DAC
69%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
SBLK - DAC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
GNK - DAC
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with SBLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then SBLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
+1.69%
SBLK - SFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
GNK - SFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
ASC - SFL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
ECO - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
DAC - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More