Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DAABX vs WCMJX
DAABX vs WCMJX Comparison
Open Charts DAABX vs WCMJX
DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl
Price$21.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.5M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
Price$3.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62M
DAABX vs WCMJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DAABX vs. WCMJX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAABX is a Hold and WCMJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAABX has more cash in the bank: 553M vs. WCMJX (1.62M). DAABX pays higher dividends than WCMJX: DAABX (1.32) vs WCMJX (0.00). DAABX was incepted earlier than WCMJX: DAABX (5 years) vs WCMJX (6 years). WCMJX (1.70) is less costly to investors than DAABX (0.35). DAABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. WCMJX (15.00). DAABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMJX: DAABX (0) vs WCMJX (1000). DAABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. WCMJX (-71.61). DAABX return over 5 years is better than : 60.78 vs. WCMJX (-67.27).
| DAABX | WCMJX | DAABX / WCMJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.70 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.657 | -71.053 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 553M | 1.62M | 34,220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.93 | -71.61 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.03 | -65.27 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.78 | -67.27 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement