Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DAABX vs SSGSX
DAABX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DAABX vs SSGSX
DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl
Price$20.70
Change+$0.31 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.88M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.61
Change+$0.66 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
DAABX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DAABX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAABX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.32B vs. DAABX (525M). DAABX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DAABX (1.34) vs SSGSX (0.48). DAABX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DAABX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than DAABX (0.35). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DAABX (16.00). DAABX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: DAABX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). DAABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. SSGSX (-8.48). DAABX return over 5 years is better than : 81.83 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| DAABX | SSGSX | DAABX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.26 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.26 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.675 | -1.034 | -452% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 5.32B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.48 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.83 | -8.48 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.39 | 1.10 | 3,405% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.83 | 18.06 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers