Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DAABX vs SSGSX
DAABX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DAABX vs SSGSX
DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl
Price$21.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.5M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
DAABX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DAABX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAABX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. DAABX (553M). DAABX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DAABX (1.32) vs SSGSX (0.48). DAABX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DAABX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than DAABX (0.35). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. DAABX (16.00). DAABX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: DAABX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). DAABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. SSGSX (-2.93). DAABX return over 5 years is better than : 60.78 vs. SSGSX (-0.61).
| DAABX | SSGSX | DAABX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.23 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.23 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.657 | -1.701 | -685% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 553M | 5.12B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.48 | 278% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.93 | -2.93 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.03 | 0.24 | 18,670% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.78 | -0.61 | -9,918% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement