Advertisement
CZWI vs HWBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZWI is a Hold and HWBK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZWI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CZWI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HWBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZWI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWBK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CZWI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HWBK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CZWI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while HWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
CZWI is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.75% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CZWI | HWBK | CZWI / HWBK | |
| Capitalization | 127M | 147M | 86% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.511 | 2.164 | -624% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.75 | 149.93 | 7% |
| Revenue | 58.5M | 55.1M | 106% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 17.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 147M | 158M | 93% |
CZWI | HWBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZWI's Valuation (25) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWBK (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.
HWBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.
HWBK's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.
HWBK's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.
CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HWBK (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew significantly faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.
| CZWI | HWBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 43% | 7 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GHAAX | 41.34 | 0.30 | +0.73% |
| VanEck Global Resources Fund A | |||
| APHIX | 33.68 | -0.14 | -0.41% |
| Artisan International Institutional | |||
| MBIRX | 53.27 | -0.47 | -0.87% |
| Morgan Stanley Insight IR | |||
| JPIVX | 30.63 | -0.30 | -0.97% |
| JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val I | |||
| RYCSX | 39.91 | -0.55 | -1.36% |
| Rydex Telecommunications C | |||
CZWI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZWI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZWI | 100% | -3.37% | ||
| FITB - CZWI | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| FBNC - CZWI | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| BUSE - CZWI | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| UBFO - CZWI | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| UCB - CZWI | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
HWBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWBK has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HWBK jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HWBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWBK | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| UBFO - HWBK | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| CZWI - HWBK | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| FSFG - HWBK | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
| FINW - HWBK | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| PWOD - HWBK | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||