CZWI
Price
$15.45
Change
+$0.72 (+4.89%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
127.47M
21 days until earnings call
HWBK
Price
$30.08
Change
-$0.08 (-0.27%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
147.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZWI vs HWBK

Header iconCZWI vs HWBK Comparison
Open Charts CZWI vs HWBKBanner chart's image
Citizens Community Ban
Price$15.45
Change+$0.72 (+4.89%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization127.47M
Hawthorn Bancshares
Price$30.08
Change-$0.08 (-0.27%)
Volume$100
Capitalization147.36M
CZWI vs HWBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZWI vs. HWBK commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZWI is a Hold and HWBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CZWI: $14.73 vs. HWBK: $30.16)
Brand notoriety: CZWI and HWBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZWI: 71% vs. HWBK: 77%
Market capitalization -- CZWI: $127.47M vs. HWBK: $147.36M
CZWI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $127.47M. HWBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $147.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZWI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZWI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the long-term than HWBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZWI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWBK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZWI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWBK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWBK is a better buy in the short-term than CZWI.

Price Growth

CZWI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.91% price change this week, while HWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWBK($147M) has a higher market cap than CZWI($127M). HWBK has higher P/E ratio than CZWI: HWBK (149.93) vs CZWI (9.75). HWBK YTD gains are higher at: 7.887 vs. CZWI (-7.482). CZWI has less debt than HWBK: CZWI (147M) vs HWBK (158M). CZWI has higher revenues than HWBK: CZWI (58.5M) vs HWBK (55.1M).
CZWIHWBKCZWI / HWBK
Capitalization127M147M86%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.4827.887-95%
P/E Ratio9.75149.937%
Revenue58.5M55.1M106%
Total CashN/A17.8M-
Total Debt147M158M93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZWI vs HWBK: Fundamental Ratings
CZWI
HWBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4126
SMR RATING
1..100
5239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
23100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZWI's Valuation (29) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWBK (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HWBK (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew significantly faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZWIHWBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REDLF0.240.01
+2.35%
VAULT MINERALS LTD
LIMAF49.300.02
+0.03%
Linamar Corporation
FAVO0.76N/A
N/A
Favo Capital, Inc.
WRFRF2.85N/A
N/A
Wharf Real Estate Investment Co Ltd.
IEGCF0.10N/A
-3.22%
Independence Gold Corp.

CZWI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZWI
1D Price
Change %
CZWI100%
+1.94%
SHBI - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
UCB - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
FITB - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBNC - CZWI
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
UBFO - CZWI
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More

HWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWBK has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HWBK jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWBK
1D Price
Change %
HWBK100%
+1.69%
UBFO - HWBK
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
CZWI - HWBK
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
FSFG - HWBK
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
FINW - HWBK
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
PWOD - HWBK
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More