CZWI
Price
$16.38
Change
+$0.06 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
161.68M
29 days until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$31.81
Change
-$0.65 (-2.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
221.95M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZWI vs FSFG

Header iconCZWI vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts CZWI vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Citizens Community Ban
Price$16.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
Volume$13.18K
Capitalization161.68M
First Savings Financial Group
Price$31.81
Change-$0.65 (-2.00%)
Volume$86.37K
Capitalization221.95M
CZWI vs FSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZWI vs. FSFG commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZWI is a Buy and FSFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CZWI: $16.38 vs. FSFG: $31.81)
Brand notoriety: CZWI and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZWI: 52% vs. FSFG: 442%
Market capitalization -- CZWI: $161.68M vs. FSFG: $221.95M
CZWI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $161.68M. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $221.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZWI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZWI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZWI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZWI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than CZWI.

Price Growth

CZWI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +15.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($222M) has a higher market cap than CZWI($162M). CZWI has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: CZWI (13.21) vs FSFG (10.26). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 22.012 vs. CZWI (2.882). CZWI has less debt than FSFG: CZWI (61.7M) vs FSFG (464M).
CZWIFSFGCZWI / FSFG
Capitalization162M222M73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.88222.01213%
P/E Ratio13.2110.26129%
Revenue57.9MN/A-
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt61.7M464M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZWI vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
CZWI
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5725
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3637
SMR RATING
1..100
6247
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (62) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZWIFSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSNUY13.630.11
+0.81%
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
MRTI62.00N/A
N/A
Maxus Realty Trust, Inc.
SIGY3.75N/A
N/A
Sigyn Therapeutics Inc.
JEHLY46.41N/A
N/A
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
SYBJF1.38N/A
N/A
Security Bank Corp.

CZWI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZWI
1D Price
Change %
CZWI100%
+0.37%
SHBI - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCCO - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
THFF - CZWI
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
UCB - CZWI
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
HBAN - CZWI
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with OCFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then OCFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-2.00%
OCFC - FSFG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
CZWI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
NBTB - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
SHBI - FSFG
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FUNC - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
More