CZR
Price
$39.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
102 days until earnings call
LVS
Price
$48.53
Change
-$1.00 (-2.02%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CZR vs LVS

Header iconCZR vs LVS Comparison
Open Charts CZR vs LVSBanner chart's image
Caesars Entertainment
Price$39.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.35M
CapitalizationN/A
Las Vegas Sands
Price$48.53
Change-$1.00 (-2.02%)
Volume$7.59M
CapitalizationN/A
CZR vs LVS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZR vs. LVS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a Hold and LVS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CZR: $39.30 vs. LVS: $49.53)
Brand notoriety: CZR: Not notable vs. LVS: Notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZR: 84% vs. LVS: 82%
Market capitalization -- CZR: $9.34B vs. LVS: $38.96B
CZR [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $9.34B. LVS’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $38.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVS is a better buy in the long-term than CZR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVS is a better buy in the short-term than CZR.

Price Growth

CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.89% price change this week, while LVS (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

LVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.73% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVS($39B) has a higher market cap than CZR($9.34B). LVS has higher P/E ratio than CZR: LVS (33.24) vs CZR (11.86). LVS YTD gains are higher at: 2.421 vs. CZR (-16.169). LVS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.86B vs. CZR (3.56B). LVS has more cash in the bank: 5.11B vs. CZR (1.01B). LVS has less debt than CZR: LVS (14B) vs CZR (25.1B). CZR has higher revenues than LVS: CZR (11.5B) vs LVS (10.4B).
CZRLVSCZR / LVS
Capitalization9.34B39B24%
EBITDA3.56B3.86B92%
Gain YTD-16.1692.421-668%
P/E Ratio11.8633.2436%
Revenue11.5B10.4B111%
Total Cash1.01B5.11B20%
Total Debt25.1B14B179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZR vs LVS: Fundamental Ratings
CZR
LVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5362
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9233
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVS's Valuation (32) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (84). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.

LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

LVS's SMR Rating (33) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (92). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.

LVS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (56). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (96). This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZRLVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

CZR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been closely correlated with MGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then MGM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZR
1D Price
Change %
CZR100%
-0.33%
MGM - CZR
68%
Closely correlated
+3.35%
PENN - CZR
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
WYNN - CZR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
MCRI - CZR
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
ACEL - CZR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

LVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVS
1D Price
Change %
LVS100%
+0.55%
WYNN - LVS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
CZR - LVS
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
GXYYY - LVS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
CHDN - LVS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
WYNMY - LVS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More