It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -11.32% price change this week, while LVS (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -3.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.
CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
CZR | LVS | CZR / LVS | |
Capitalization | 9.34B | 39B | 24% |
EBITDA | 3.56B | 3.86B | 92% |
Gain YTD | -29.991 | 8.046 | -373% |
P/E Ratio | 11.86 | 33.24 | 36% |
Revenue | 11.5B | 10.4B | 111% |
Total Cash | 1.01B | 5.11B | 20% |
Total Debt | 25.1B | 14B | 179% |
CZR | LVS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 24 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LVS's Valuation (34) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (81). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (26) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZR (92). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (64). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (92). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.
CZR | LVS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago78% | 4 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 12 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been closely correlated with MGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then MGM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CZR | 100% | -0.76% | ||
MGM - CZR | 67% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
PENN - CZR | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
WYNN - CZR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
MCRI - CZR | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
ACEL - CZR | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LVS | 100% | +1.89% | ||
WYNN - LVS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
CZR - LVS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
GXYYY - LVS | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
WYNMY - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
GDEN - LVS | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More |