CZR
Price
$25.56
Change
-$1.75 (-6.41%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.34B
51 days until earnings call
FLUT
Price
$264.61
Change
-$6.78 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
35.34B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZR vs FLUT

Header iconCZR vs FLUT Comparison
Open Charts CZR vs FLUTBanner chart's image
Caesars Entertainment
Price$25.56
Change-$1.75 (-6.41%)
Volume$6.9M
Capitalization9.34B
Flutter Entertainment
Price$264.61
Change-$6.78 (-2.50%)
Volume$2.62M
Capitalization35.34B
CZR vs FLUT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZR vs. FLUT commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a StrongBuy and FLUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CZR: $25.56 vs. FLUT: $264.61)
Brand notoriety: CZR and FLUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZR: 130% vs. FLUT: 137%
Market capitalization -- CZR: $9.34B vs. FLUT: $35.34B
CZR [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $9.34B. FLUT’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $35.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLUT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLUT is a better buy in the long-term than CZR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLUT is a better buy in the short-term than CZR.

Price Growth

CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +6.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

FLUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.81% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLUT($35.3B) has a higher market cap than CZR($9.34B). FLUT YTD gains are higher at: 2.383 vs. CZR (-23.519). CZR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.56B vs. FLUT (1.27B). CZR has higher revenues than FLUT: CZR (11.5B) vs FLUT (9.11B).
CZRFLUTCZR / FLUT
Capitalization9.34B35.3B26%
EBITDA3.56B1.27B280%
Gain YTD-23.5192.383-987%
P/E Ratio11.86N/A-
Revenue11.5B9.11B126%
Total Cash1.01BN/A-
Total Debt25.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZR vs FLUT: Fundamental Ratings
CZR
FLUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
9182
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLUT's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CZR (84) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CZR (91) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CZR (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZRFLUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRDN15.880.21
+1.34%
Viridian Therapeutics
AMG182.01-2.07
-1.12%
Affiliated Managers Group
TG8.60-0.18
-2.05%
Tredegar Corp
ECL264.21-6.74
-2.49%
Ecolab
JOB0.18-0.01
-5.30%
GEE Group

CZR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been closely correlated with MGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then MGM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZR
1D Price
Change %
CZR100%
-6.41%
MGM - CZR
75%
Closely correlated
-4.25%
BYD - CZR
71%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
PENN - CZR
69%
Closely correlated
-5.28%
RRR - CZR
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
GDEN - CZR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

FLUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLUT
1D Price
Change %
FLUT100%
-2.50%
DKNG - FLUT
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.90%
BYD - FLUT
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
PENN - FLUT
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.28%
CZR - FLUT
47%
Loosely correlated
-6.41%
INSE - FLUT
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.39%
More