CZNL
Price
$42.24
Change
-$0.61 (-1.42%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
41.94M
DBSDF
Price
$35.21
Change
-$2.13 (-5.70%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
66.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZNL vs DBSDF

Header iconCZNL vs DBSDF Comparison
Open Charts CZNL vs DBSDFBanner chart's image
Citizens National
Price$42.24
Change-$0.61 (-1.42%)
Volume$500
Capitalization41.94M
DBS Group Holdings
Price$35.21
Change-$2.13 (-5.70%)
Volume$3.83K
Capitalization66.63B
CZNL vs DBSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZNL vs. DBSDF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZNL is a Hold and DBSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CZNL: $41.99 vs. DBSDF: $34.97)
Brand notoriety: CZNL and DBSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZNL: 131% vs. DBSDF: 65%
Market capitalization -- CZNL: $41.94M vs. DBSDF: $66.63B
CZNL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.94M. DBSDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBSDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CZNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBSDF is a better buy in the long-term than CZNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZNL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBSDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZNL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DBSDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBSDF is a better buy in the short-term than CZNL.

Price Growth

CZNL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DBSDF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDF($66.6B) has a higher market cap than CZNL($41.9M). DBSDF YTD gains are higher at: 4.889 vs. CZNL (-7.658). CZNL has less debt than DBSDF: CZNL (6.2M) vs DBSDF (47.1B). DBSDF has higher revenues than CZNL: DBSDF (17.7B) vs CZNL (16.8M).
CZNLDBSDFCZNL / DBSDF
Capitalization41.9M66.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.6584.889-157%
P/E RatioN/A7.68-
Revenue16.8M17.7B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt6.2M47.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZNL vs DBSDF: Fundamental Ratings
CZNL
DBSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
533
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZNL's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBSDF (92). This means that CZNL’s stock grew significantly faster than DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZNL (100). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZNL (53). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CZNL (76). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CZNL (34). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZNLDBSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKBLF0.05N/A
N/A
Magnetic North Acquisition Corp.
CHFHY6.27N/A
N/A
China Foods Ltd.
JREIF800.00N/A
N/A
Japan Real Estate Investment Inc.
CODYY23.11-0.12
-0.54%
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain
EDTXF0.60N/A
-0.73%
Spectral Medical Inc.

CZNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZNL and WVFC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZNL and WVFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZNL
1D Price
Change %
CZNL100%
N/A
WVFC - CZNL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOGN - CZNL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYVF - CZNL
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
DBSDF - CZNL
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.35%
CZBC - CZNL
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DBSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDF has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBSDF jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDF
1D Price
Change %
DBSDF100%
-6.35%
DNBBF - DBSDF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
FKKFY - DBSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOVEY - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
CHBAF - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVCB - DBSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More