It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZMWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIRME’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZMWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRME’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CZMWF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.81% price change this week, while IRME (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.90%.
IRME is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.08% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CZMWF | IRME | CZMWF / IRME | |
Capitalization | 4.33B | 1.17M | 369,915% |
EBITDA | 226M | -1.45M | -15,597% |
Gain YTD | 5.031 | -96.761 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | 25.22 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.18B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 51.5M | 63K | 81,746% |
Total Debt | 147M | 250K | 58,800% |
CZMWF | IRME | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZMWF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRME (96). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRME’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IRME (100). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to IRME’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as IRME (100). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to IRME’s over the last 12 months.
IRME's Price Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWF (86). This means that IRME’s stock grew similarly to CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRME (100). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRME’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF | IRME | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago43% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago42% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago48% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago39% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UDIV | 50.35 | 0.13 | +0.27% |
Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | |||
OASC | 27.82 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF | |||
VRIG | 25.11 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF | |||
UPGR | 20.30 | N/A | N/A |
Xtrackers US Green Infras Sel Eq ETF | |||
HGLB | 8.66 | -0.02 | -0.17% |
Highland Global Allocation Fund |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZMWF has been loosely correlated with CZMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZMWF jumps, then CZMWY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZMWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CZMWF | 100% | N/A | ||
CZMWY - CZMWF | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
XAIR - CZMWF | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
SHWGY - CZMWF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ECIA - CZMWF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IRME - CZMWF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IRME and CZMWY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRME and CZMWY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IRME | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IRME | 100% | N/A | ||
CZMWY - IRME | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
XAIR - IRME | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
SRTOY - IRME | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
CZMWF - IRME | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GNGBY - IRME | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More |