Advertisement
CZMWF vs ECIA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMWF is a Hold and ECIA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZMWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileECIA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CZMWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ECIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZMWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECIA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CZMWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ECIA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CZMWF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -12.92% price change this week, while ECIA (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -13.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.26% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| CZMWF | ECIA | CZMWF / ECIA | |
| Capitalization | 4.4B | 3.56M | 123,429% |
| EBITDA | 389M | -394.15K | -98,695% |
| Gain YTD | 1.559 | -33.333 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.47 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.17B | 6.5M | 33,390% |
| Total Cash | 51.5M | 348K | 14,799% |
| Total Debt | 147M | 1.31M | 11,221% |
CZMWF | ECIA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZMWF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (71). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECIA (100). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as ECIA (96). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's Price Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWF (89). This means that ECIA’s stock grew similarly to CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZMWF (64). This means that ECIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.
| CZMWF | ECIA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
CZMWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZMWF has been loosely correlated with CZMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZMWF jumps, then CZMWY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZMWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZMWF | 100% | -8.26% | ||
| CZMWY - CZMWF | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| XAIR - CZMWF | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.63% | ||
| SHWGY - CZMWF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ECIA - CZMWF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IRME - CZMWF | 21% Poorly correlated | -23.78% | ||
More | ||||
ECIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and CVRX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and CVRX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECIA | 100% | N/A | ||
| CVRX - ECIA | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.32% | ||
| SINT - ECIA | 25% Poorly correlated | +7.64% | ||
| SEMHF - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.58% | ||
| CZMWF - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | -8.26% | ||
| TMCI - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | +7.92% | ||
More | ||||