CZMWF vs ECIA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMWF is a Hold and ECIA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZMWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileECIA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CZMWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ECIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
CZMWF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -5.39% price change this week, while ECIA (@Medical Specialties) price change was -16.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECIA is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-2.40% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CZMWF | ECIA | CZMWF / ECIA | |
| Capitalization | 10.4B | 5.41M | 192,095% |
| EBITDA | 481M | -529.03K | -90,920% |
| Gain YTD | -42.938 | -1.176 | 3,650% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.67 | 47.17 | 71% |
| Revenue | 2.02B | 7.15M | 28,296% |
| Total Cash | 44.3M | 120K | 36,917% |
| Total Debt | 211M | 976K | 21,619% |
CZMWF | ECIA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZMWF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (68). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWF (100). This means that ECIA’s stock grew similarly to CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.
CZMWF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (95). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZMWF (86). This means that ECIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZMWF (88). This means that ECIA’s stock grew significantly faster than CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CZMWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZMWF has been loosely correlated with CZMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZMWF jumps, then CZMWY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZMWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZMWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CZMWY - CZMWF | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| XAIR - CZMWF | 31% Poorly correlated | +9.71% | ||
| SHWGY - CZMWF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ECIA - CZMWF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IRME - CZMWF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ECIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and CVRX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and CVRX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECIA | 100% | N/A | ||
| CVRX - ECIA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| SINT - ECIA | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| SEMHF - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CZMWF - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NVRO - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | -8.54% | ||
More | ||||