Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$15.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CZMSX (1.53B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FTHFX (0.69) vs CZMSX (0.44). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. CZMSX (-5.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. CZMSX (-14.85).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.63 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.509 | 14.113 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 11.1B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.69 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.60 | 12.53 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.69 | 50.85 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.85 | 76.22 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 227.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement