Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.85
Change+$0.25 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CZMSX (1.52B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FTHFX (0.69) vs CZMSX (0.44). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. CZMSX (-8.70). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.10 vs. CZMSX (-3.37).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.63 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.280 | 11.471 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 11.1B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.69 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.70 | -4.44 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.36 | 39.81 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.37 | 81.10 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 171.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement