Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.66
Change+$0.24 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.82
Change+$0.37 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. CZMSX (1.52B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (0.84) vs CZMSX (0.44). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. CZMSX (3.91). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.93 vs. CZMSX (16.50).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 4,640% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.523 | 7.731 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 27.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.84 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.91 | 13.29 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.82 | 39.27 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.50 | 61.93 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement