Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.10
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. CZMSX (2.36B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (0.92) vs CZMSX (0.47). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. CZMSX (-3.19). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. CZMSX (17.53).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 4,640% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.889 | 2.204 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 25.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.92 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.19 | 3.28 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.44 | 31.42 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.53 | 60.96 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers