Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.79
Change-$0.18 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. CZMSX (1.46B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (0.82) vs CZMSX (0.45). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.81 vs. CZMSX (-4.23). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.82 vs. CZMSX (6.84).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 4,640% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.731 | 11.886 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 28.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.82 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.23 | 9.81 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | 47.36 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.84 | 57.82 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 109.00 | - |