Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.25
Change-$0.18 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. CZMSX (1.58B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (1.03) vs CZMSX (0.63). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. CZMSX (-1.94). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. CZMSX (-17.69).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,840% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.070 | 6.434 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 29.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | 18.62 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.58 | 39.32 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.69 | 25.49 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 169.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement