Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs RGACX
CZMGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs RGACX
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
Price$20.24
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.8M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CZMGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CZMGX (104M). RGACX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: RGACX (0.07) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CZMGX (9 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CZMGX (0.76). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CZMGX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. CZMGX (3.53). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. CZMGX (16.17).
| CZMGX | RGACX | CZMGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.556 | 14.044 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.53 | 14.08 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.34 | 41.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.17 | 41.95 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement