Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs GFACX
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs GFACX
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
Price$21.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.55M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CZMGX (96.6M). CZMGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CZMGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CZMGX (9 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CZMGX (1.11). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CZMGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. CZMGX (-3.92). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.23 vs. CZMGX (7.51).
| CZMGX | GFACX | CZMGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.36 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.36 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.432 | 19.322 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.6M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.92 | 5.80 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.30 | 56.29 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.51 | 23.23 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement