CZFS
Price
$57.01
Change
+$0.91 (+1.62%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
275.84M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCF
Price
$15.86
Change
-$0.04 (-0.25%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs FCF

Header iconCZFS vs FCF Comparison
Open Charts CZFS vs FCFBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Services
Price$57.01
Change+$0.91 (+1.62%)
Volume$13.49K
Capitalization275.84M
First Commonwealth Financial
Price$15.86
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
Volume$686.98K
Capitalization1.65B
CZFS vs FCF Comparison Chart in %
CZFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZFS vs. FCF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Buy and FCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CZFS: $57.01 vs. FCF: $15.86)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and FCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 151% vs. FCF: 108%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $275.84M vs. FCF: $1.65B
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $275.84M. FCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than CZFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the short-term than CZFS.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.17% price change this week, while FCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

FCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($1.65B) has a higher market cap than CZFS($276M). FCF has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: FCF (11.41) vs CZFS (8.08). FCF YTD gains are higher at: -3.111 vs. CZFS (-6.737). CZFS has less debt than FCF: CZFS (313M) vs FCF (488M). FCF has higher revenues than CZFS: FCF (491M) vs CZFS (105M).
CZFSFCFCZFS / FCF
Capitalization276M1.65B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.737-3.111217%
P/E Ratio8.0811.4171%
Revenue105M491M21%
Total CashN/A121M-
Total Debt313M488M64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs FCF: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
FCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6227
SMR RATING
1..100
4319
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8255
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8522

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FCF (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (62) in the null industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (43) in the null industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (60) in the null industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (82) in the null industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFLX32.41N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise L
STSEX2701.36-25.44
-0.93%
BlackRock Exchange BlackRock
MIRGX43.67-0.77
-1.73%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R2
STSVX19.16-0.37
-1.89%
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val I
VLEOX62.62-1.33
-2.08%
Value Line Small Cap Opportunities Inv

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+1.62%
PFIS - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
BY - CZFS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
CTBI - CZFS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
FCF - CZFS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
FRME - CZFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More

FCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCF has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCF jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCF
1D Price
Change %
FCF100%
-0.25%
PEBO - FCF
90%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
SBSI - FCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
NWBI - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
IBOC - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
STBA - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
More